Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
A Comparability Study Between Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Magnetic
Man Cho Lee1, King Him Fung1, Shing Him Liu1
1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.
Abstract:
Background: MRA is used in our center for monitoring post-treatment residual aneurysmal neck and stent patency. IV CBCT offers better spatial resolution and may provide significant advantages. Objective: This study investigates the image quality of IV CBCT compared to that of MRA for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 97 patients (mean age: 63.1 ± 11.7; 75 women and 22 men) with 114 treated cerebral aneurysms were included from July 2023 to April 2024. All patients underwent IV CBCT and MRA on the same day. Two neurointerventional radiologists assessed image quality using a five-point Likert scale on two separate occasions six weeks apart. Diagnostic values were evaluated across six parameters. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Results: Overall, IV CBCT and MRA are comparable in terms of their ability to assess parent vessel status and the degree of artifacts (p > 0.05) though MRA shows a slight advantage in evaluating residual aneurysmal neck (p = 0.05). For clipped aneurysms, IV CBCT is superior in assessing residual aneurysmal neck (OR = 16.0, p < 0.001) and parent vessel status (OR = 15.1, p < 0.001) with significantly fewer artifacts (OR > 100, p < 0.001). For aneurysms solely treated with stents, IV CBCT is superior in assessing residual aneurysmal neck (OR > 20, p = 0.002) and parent vessel status (OR > 20, p = 0.002) with significantly fewer artifacts (OR > 20, p = 0.002). IV CBCT outperforms MRA in evaluating stent struts and the vessel wall status of a stented segment when MRA is non-diagnostic. Conclusions: IV CBCT and MRA have their own strengths and roles in the follow-up of post-treatment intracranial aneurysms. Overall, IV CBCT is superior in terms of its assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated solely with stents or surgical clips.
Insights
Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (IV CBCT) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are compared for intracranial aneurysm follow-up. IV CBCT shows superior image quality for stent-treated aneurysms, offering better assessment of residual neck and parent vessel status.
Area of Science:
- Neuroradiology
- Medical Imaging
- Interventional Neurology
Background:
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is standard for monitoring treated intracranial aneurysms, assessing residual neck and stent patency.
- Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography (IV CBCT) offers superior spatial resolution, potentially improving aneurysm follow-up.
- This study compares the diagnostic image quality of IV CBCT versus MRA for intracranial aneurysm follow-up.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare the image quality of IV CBCT and MRA in the follow-up of treated intracranial aneurysms.
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of each modality across key imaging parameters.
- To determine the optimal imaging technique for specific aneurysm treatment types.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study including 97 patients with 114 treated cerebral aneurysms.
- Patients underwent both IV CBCT and MRA on the same day.
- Two blinded neurointerventional radiologists assessed image quality using a five-point Likert scale, evaluating diagnostic values and artifacts. Intra- and inter-observer agreement were calculated.
Main Results:
- Overall, IV CBCT and MRA showed comparable performance in assessing parent vessel status and artifact levels (p > 0.05).
- MRA had a slight advantage in evaluating residual aneurysmal neck (p = 0.05).
- IV CBCT demonstrated superior assessment of residual aneurysmal neck (OR = 16.0, p < 0.001) and parent vessel status (OR = 15.1, p < 0.001) with fewer artifacts (OR > 100, p < 0.001) for clipped aneurysms.
- For stent-treated aneurysms, IV CBCT was superior for residual neck (OR > 20, p = 0.002) and parent vessel status (OR > 20, p = 0.002) with significantly fewer artifacts (OR > 20, p = 0.002).
- IV CBCT outperformed MRA in evaluating stent struts and vessel wall status when MRA was non-diagnostic.
Conclusions:
- Both IV CBCT and MRA have distinct strengths and roles in post-treatment intracranial aneurysm follow-up.
- IV CBCT demonstrates superior efficacy in assessing intracranial aneurysms treated with stents or surgical clips, particularly regarding residual neck, parent vessel patency, and artifact reduction.
- The findings support IV CBCT as a valuable tool, potentially replacing MRA in specific follow-up scenarios.
More Related Videos
09:32Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies