Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
A Formative Evaluation of Interventions to Enhance Clinical Trial Diversity Guided by the Socioecological Model
Melany Garcia1, Carley Geiss2, Rebecca Blackwell2,3
1Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Background/Objectives:
Racial and ethnic minority patients are underrepresented in cancer clinical trials (CCTs) and multilevel strategies are required to increase participation. This study describes barriers and facilitators to minority CCT participation alongside feedback on a multilevel intervention (MLI) designed to reduce participation barriers, as posited by the socioecological model (SEM).
Methods:
Interviews with Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) physicians, community physicians, patients with cancer, community residents, and clinical research coordinators (CRCs) were conducted from June 2023-February 2024. Verbal responses were analyzed using thematic analysis and categorized into SEM levels. Mean helpfulness scores rating interventions (from 1 (not helpful) to 5 (very helpful)) were summarized.
Results:
Approximately 50 interviews were completed. Thematic findings confirmed CCT referral and enrollment barriers across all SEM levels. At the community level, MCC patients and community residents felt that community health educators can improve patient experiences and suggested they connect patients to social/financial resources, assist with patient registration, and provide CCT education. While physicians and CRCs reacted positively to all institutional-level tools, the highest scored tool simultaneously addressed CCT referral and enrollment at the institution (e.g., trial identification/referrals) and interpersonal level (communication platform for community and MCC physicians) (mean = 4.27). At the intrapersonal level, patients were enthusiastic about a digital CCT decision aid (mean = 4.53) and suggested its integration into MCC's patient portal.
Conclusions:
Results underscore the value of conducting formative research to tailor interventions to target population needs. Our approach can be leveraged by future researchers seeking to evaluate MLIs addressing additional CCT challenges or broader health topics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

