Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025
Detection of Cell-Free DNA in Blood Plasma Samples of Cancer Patients
Published on: September 9, 2020
Plasma WFDC2 (HE4) as a Predictive Biomarker for Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-1 Therapy: A
Makoto Watanabe1,2,3,4, Katsuaki Ieguchi1,2, Takashi Shimizu1,2
1Department of Clinical Diagnostic Oncology, Clinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa Medical University, Tokyo 157-8577, Japan.
None:
Background/Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy; however, reliable biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy remain limited. We investigated the clinical utility of plasma WFDC2 levels in patients receiving anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. Methods: Twenty-one patients with non-small cell lung, gastric, or bladder cancer received nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Plasma WFDC2 concentrations were measured by ELISA before ICI treatment (pre-ICI) and after two and four treatment cycles. Associations between WFDC2 expression changes and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor progression were assessed. ROC curve analyses compared the predictive performance of WFDC2, soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1), soluble PD-1 (sPD-1), and their combinations, with the area under the curve (AUC) evaluating predictive accuracy. Results: Levels of WFDC2 pre-ICI and those after two cycles were significantly higher than levels in healthy donors. However, no significant differences in WFDC2 levels were found between the time points during treatment. Greater increases in WFDC2 levels were significantly correlated with shorter OS (p = 0.002), shorter PFS (p = 0.037), and tumor progression (p = 0.003). ROC analysis revealed that WFDC2 achieved a higher AUC (0.700) than sPD-L1 (0.538) or sPD-1 (0.650). Combining biomarkers improved the predictive accuracy, with sPD-L1 plus WFDC2 showing the highest AUC (0.825). Conclusions: Serial increases in plasma WFDC2 are associated with poor clinical outcomes, highlighting its potential as a biomarker. Baseline plasma WFDC2 outperformed sPD-L1 and sPD-1 diagnostically. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating, requiring confirmation in larger, tumor-specific cohorts with multivariate adjustment. WFDC2 represents a promising minimally invasive biomarker for the early identification of patients unlikely to benefit from ICI therapy.
