Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The Influence of Spatial Distance and Trade-Off Salience on Ethical Decision-Making: An Eye-Tracking Study Based on
Yu Yang1, Yirui Li2, Qingsong Lin1
1School of Educational Science, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang 473001, China.
Abstract:
Research based on the theory of embodied cognition has revealed that the vertical position of target information in space influences individuals' construal level, which in turn affects their ethical decision-making. However, previous studies have shown inconsistent effects of construal level on ethical decision-making, which may be moderated by factors such as the manipulation methods of construal level and the salience of trade-offs. This study examines how manipulating the vertical position (high/low) of target information in space-thereby altering perceived spatial distance-impacts ethical decision-making through the lens of embodied cognition, using eye-tracking technology. Experiment 1 isolated the effect of target verticality, while Experiment 2 introduced trade-off salience as an additional factor. Eye-tracking metrics in Experiment 1 revealed that lower target positions significantly increased late-stage cognitive processing difficulty. Experiment 2 demonstrated an interaction between target position and trade-off salience in ethical decision-making. These findings suggest that spatial positioning influences cognitive processing via construal level, with its effects on ethical decision-making moderated by trade-off cues. In summary, this study reveals the significant influence of trade-off salience as a contextual cue in individuals' ethical decision-making while also providing an embodied cognition perspective to inform decision behavior in human-computer interaction contexts.

