Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Cost-Utility Analysis of Different Treatment Modalities in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention:
Oraluck Pattanaprateep1, Thosaphol Limpijankit2, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee1
1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background:
Cost-utility analyses of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) provide valuable insights into the economic value of these procedures. However, data is lacking, particularly in developing countries with limited resources.
Aims:
This analysis aimed to compare the cost-utility of different treatment modalities used for PCI patients within a Thai PCI registry.
Methods:
Clinical and quality-of-life data from 39 hospitals spread throughout Thailand were used in this analysis. Three treatment modalities for PCI procedures were compared: (a) radial versus femoral access, (b) partial versus complete revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease, and (c) use versus non-use of device-guided PCIs (intracoronary ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, or fractional flow reserve). Cost data were obtained from each patient's bill for their hospital stay. Utility scores were measured using the Thai EQ-5D-5L at admission, discharge, and 1-year postprocedure. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was then estimated and used for each comparison.
Results:
Of 19,701 patients enrolled in 2018-19, approximately one-third (n = 7332) had hospital cost data available for analysis. At discharge, the mean costs associated with radial access and partial revascularization were $986 and $391, respectively, less than the costs for device-guided PCIs, which increased by a mean of $2004. The delta utility gains for these approaches were 2.97, 1.60, and 1.07 at discharge and 1.08, 1.06, and 0.29 at 1 year, respectively. The estimated ICERs at 1 year were -$894, -$359, and $7041 per unit of utility gained, respectively.
Conclusion:
Radial access and partial revascularization are cost-effective PCI strategies, while lesion severity assessment devices incur high costs per unit of utility gained. Identifying the factors that influence these outcomes may assist clinicians in tailoring interventions to optimize a patient's quality of life after PCI.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT