Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative analysis of observer depression scales.

W Maier, M Philipp

    Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
    |September 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    The Bech Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale (BRMS) and Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) outperform the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) in evaluating depression. BRMS demonstrated superior homogeneity and transferability compared to MADRS.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The value and role of mosquito meshes in low resource and poor income settings: author's reply.

    Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2021
    Same author

    Alterations in the mechanical, chemical and biocompatibility properties of low-cost polyethylene and polyester meshes after steam sterilization.

    Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2020
    Same author

    [Demographic perspective on the concept of the tailored approach in surgery : Analysis of the quality of life exemplified by inguinal hernia repair].

    Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2019
    Same author

    [Inguinal Hernia Repair According to Desarda - Implementation of a Mesh-Free Method in a German University Hospital].

    Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2015
    Same author

    [Autopsies for anatomical teaching and training in clinical forensic medicine].

    Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2015
    Same author

    [Treatment of a subsequently detected, iatrogenic colonic perforation via minimal-invasive rendezvous procedure].

    Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2014

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Depression assessment relies on validated rating scales.
    • Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Bech Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale (BRMS), and Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) are commonly used.
    • Comparative analysis is crucial for selecting optimal diagnostic tools.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the psychometric properties of HAMD, BRMS, and MADRS.
    • To evaluate discriminatory power, internal consistency, homogeneity, and transferability.
    • To determine the most effective depression rating scale.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of HAMD, BRMS, and MADRS.
    • Evaluation across distinct patient samples: operationalized depressive syndrome, Major Depressive Disorder (RDC), and Major Depressive Disorder, endogenous type (RDC).
    • Assessment of mean discriminatory power, internal consistency, homogeneity, and transferability.

    Main Results:

    • BRMS and MADRS demonstrated superior performance over HAMD across all evaluated psychometric aspects.
    • BRMS exhibited greater homogeneity and transferability than MADRS.
    • Both BRMS and MADRS proved more effective than HAMD in discriminating depressive symptoms.

    Conclusions:

    • BRMS and MADRS are more robust than HAMD for assessing depression.
    • BRMS offers the best combination of homogeneity and transferability among the scales evaluated.
    • The choice of scale impacts the reliability and validity of depression assessments.

    Related Experiment Videos