Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

386
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
386
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

1.6K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
1.6K
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

160
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
160
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

896
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
896
Classification of Leukocytes01:30

Classification of Leukocytes

2.7K
Leukocytes are classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of cytoplasmic granules. Granular leukocytes, which contain granules, belong to the myeloid lineage and are divided into three subtypes: neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils. These cells are roughly spherical and characterized by the granules in their cytoplasm.
Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granular leukocytes, comprising 50-70% of all leukocytes. They feature small, evenly distributed granules and a...
2.7K
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

242
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
242

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Magnetic resonance identification tags for ultra-flexible electrodes.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Unsupervised Representation Learning From Sparse Transformation Analysis.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2025
Same author

CellSAM: a foundation model for cell segmentation.

Nature methods·2025
Same author

Cellular and Spatial Drivers of Unresolved Injury and Functional Decline in the Human Kidney.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

The Multi-Agent Behavior Dataset: Mouse Dyadic Social Interactions.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2024
Same author

A number sense as an emergent property of the manipulating brain.

Scientific reports·2024
Same journal

A Guide to Structureless Visual Localization.

International journal of computer vision·2026
Same journal

Distillation-free Scaling of Large State-Space Models for Images and Videos.

International journal of computer vision·2026
Same journal

Are Minimal Radial Distortion Solvers Really Necessary for Relative Pose Estimation?

International journal of computer vision·2026
Same journal

Structure-from-motion in micro-image domain for uncalibrated plenoptic 2.0 cameras.

International journal of computer vision·2026
Same journal

FourierMIL: Fourier Filtering-based Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Analysis.

International journal of computer vision·2025
Same journal

A Likelihood Ratio-Based Approach to Segmenting Unknown Objects.

International journal of computer vision·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.7K

A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-supervised Pre-training with Image Classification.

Markus Marks1, Manuel Knott1,2,3,4, Neehar Kondapaneni1

  • 1California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA.

International Journal of Computer Vision
|July 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Self-supervised learning (SSL) models learn from unlabeled data. This study shows linear/kNN probing protocols best predict SSL model performance on new tasks, regardless of dataset or architecture. Batch normalization

Keywords:
BenchmarkingComputer visionImage classificationSelf-supervised learning

More Related Videos

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

2.6K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.7K
Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

2.6K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Machine Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Self-supervised learning (SSL) leverages unlabeled data for model training, reducing reliance on costly manual labeling.
  • SSL is crucial in computer vision for pre-training models, enabling tasks like transfer learning and few-shot learning.
  • Evaluating the quality of representations learned by SSL models across diverse downstream tasks remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correlation between classification-based evaluation protocols for SSL.
  • To assess how well these protocols predict downstream performance across various dataset types.
  • To understand the impact of model architecture and dataset domain shifts on evaluation protocol reliability.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a comprehensive study involving eleven image datasets and 26 pre-trained models using diverse SSL methods.
  • Evaluated SSL methods using in-domain protocols: fine-tuning, linear probing, and k-nearest neighbors (kNN).
  • Analyzed the influence of batch normalization and dataset domain shifts on protocol performance and correlation.

Main Results:

  • In-domain linear probing and kNN protocols demonstrated the strongest average predictive power for out-of-domain performance.
  • Found that most performance differences between discriminative and generative SSL methods are attributable to model backbone variations.
  • Established that evaluation protocol robustness varies with dataset domain shifts.

Conclusions:

  • Linear/kNN probing serve as effective general predictors for assessing SSL representation quality across different downstream applications.
  • Model backbone architecture significantly influences performance, often more than the specific SSL training method.
  • Further research is needed to refine SSL evaluation protocols for diverse real-world scenarios.