Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Intraoperative Navigation, 3D Printed Prostheses, and Conventional Techniques in Femoral and Tibial Tumor Resections:
Nora A Galoustian1, Brandon Gettleman2, Aura Elias1
1David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract:
Technological advancements in orthopaedic oncology continue to augment our approach to surgical interventions. However, the impact on patient outcomes following lower extremity bone tumor resections remains under-characterized. This systematic review identifies the impact of various technological advancements on post-operative outcomes. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases (2014-2024) identified studies on lower extremity bone tumor resections involving 3D prostheses/patient-specific instruments (3D PSI), intraoperative navigation, and control conventional surgeries. Individual case reports, cadaveric, and animal studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and extracted Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores and data on complications (infections, fractures, revisions). Interventions were segmented by use of technology in surgery between 3D patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), intraoperative navigation and conventional approaches. Descriptive analysis was employed to calculate the weighted means, frequencies, and proportions of complications across technology subgroups. Out of 2841 studies screened, 40 studies with 606 patients met inclusion criteria. Average patient age was 30.7 ± 14.3 years with mean follow-up period of 32.9 ± 20.5 months. Overall complication rates were 11.9 ± 12.9 for 3D PSI, 16.4 ± 16.7% for intraoperative navigation, and 32.7 ± 2.8% for conventional. Weighted mean infection rates were 3.3 ± 6.2% for 3D PSI, 3.4 ± 4.3% for intraoperative navigation, and 7.2 ± 7.8% for conventional. Mean revision rates were 1.6 ± 5.4% for 3D PSI, 2.5 ± 5.6% for intraoperative navigation, and 7.2 ± 3.1% for conventional. Weighted mean MSTS scores were similar between groups (26.4 ± 4.4 3D PSI, 25.4 ± 2.8 intraoperative navigation, 26.2 ± 6.2 conventional). This Level III Evidence study's results suggest that application of technological advances to operative management of musculoskeletal tumors may decrease complication rates while maintaining MSTS scores.
Insights
Technological advancements like 3D patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and intraoperative navigation in lower extremity bone tumor surgery show lower complication rates than conventional methods. These advanced techniques maintain functional outcomes, as measured by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores.
Area of Science:
- Orthopaedic Oncology
- Surgical Technology
- Musculoskeletal Tumors
Background:
- Technological advancements are transforming orthopaedic oncology surgical interventions.
- The impact of these technologies on patient outcomes after lower extremity bone tumor resections requires further characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the impact of technological advancements on post-operative outcomes in lower extremity bone tumor resections.
- To compare complication rates and functional scores between 3D patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), intraoperative navigation, and conventional surgical approaches.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases (2014-2024).
- Inclusion of studies on lower extremity bone tumor resections involving 3D PSI, intraoperative navigation, or conventional surgery.
- Extraction of Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores and complication data (infections, fractures, revisions).
Main Results:
- 40 studies with 606 patients met inclusion criteria.
- Overall complication rates were lower with 3D PSI (11.9%) and intraoperative navigation (16.4%) compared to conventional surgery (32.7%).
- Weighted mean infection and revision rates were also reduced with technological interventions, while Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores remained comparable across all groups.
Conclusions:
- Application of technological advances in musculoskeletal tumor surgery may decrease complication rates.
- These technologies appear to maintain functional outcomes (MSTS scores) in patients undergoing lower extremity bone tumor resections.
- Further research supports the integration of advanced technologies in orthopaedic oncology for improved patient care.
More Related Videos
08:15Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023
10:23Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
Published on: September 2, 2025