Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

A Method for Screening and Validation of Resistant Mutations Against Kinase Inhibitors
Published on: December 7, 2014
Structured Application of Genetic Testing in a Pediatric Kidney Clinic
Jordy Salcedo-Giraldo1, Krista R Wink1,2, Nicholas Dadzie2
1Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
A structured nephrogenetics workflow significantly improves outcomes for children with inherited kidney diseases. Informative genetic tests led to better diagnoses, treatments, and avoided unnecessary procedures, highlighting the need for integrated care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology and Clinical Genetics.
- Implementation of a pediatric nephrogenetics workflow for managing hereditary renal disorders.
- Precision medicine in the context of pediatric inherited kidney disease.
Background:
Prior research has shown that identifiable genetic contributions to renal pathologies are expanding rapidly due to advancements in high-throughput sequencing technologies. Genomic resources now offer unprecedented diagnostic potential for families facing hereditary conditions that were previously difficult to characterize. While structured clinical models for adult populations are well-documented in medical literature, the specific utility for younger cohorts remains less clear. Clinicians require evidence-based frameworks to integrate molecular findings into routine pediatric care effectively without causing a diagnostic odyssey. The lack of standardized protocols for children complicates the transition from raw sequencing data to actionable medical management in real-world settings. Pediatric patients often present with unique phenotypic expressions that differ significantly from adult-onset hereditary nephropathies. This absence of evidence motivated the current evaluation of a specialized outpatient program designed to bridge the gap between genetics and nephrology.
Purpose Of The Study:
This investigation assesses the clinical impact of a structured nephrogenetics workflow on pediatric patients with suspected hereditary renal conditions. Researchers examined longitudinal data from a single-center outpatient program spanning a decade of clinical practice to identify trends in diagnostic yield. The analysis focused on how molecular diagnostics influence disease management and long-term patient outcomes across various sub-specialties. Investigators categorized genetic variants as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) to determine their diagnostic utility. The study sought to distinguish between informative and uninformative test results based on their direct effect on medical decision-making and therapeutic adjustments. By quantifying these shifts in care, the team aimed to validate a multidisciplinary model for pediatric nephrology that can be replicated elsewhere. This effort provides a clear roadmap for integrating genetic counselors and nephrologists into a unified diagnostic team.
Main Methods:
The research team conducted a retrospective evaluation of clinical and molecular data from three hundred fifty-six individuals suspected of having renal genetic disorders. Participants ranged in age from less than one year to twenty-one years at the time of their initial clinical assessment. Clinicians utilized a specialized outpatient framework to manage suspected cases of inherited kidney disease (IKD) over a ten-year window between 2014 and 2024. Genetic testing was performed on one hundred eighty-eight subjects within this cohort to identify underlying molecular causes for their renal presentations. Variants were strictly classified according to established American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines into pathogenic or likely pathogenic categories. The investigators further identified a subset of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that demonstrated clinical relevance during longitudinal follow-up. Statistical comparisons utilized odds ratios (OR) and ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CI) to determine testing likelihood across different disease categories.
Main Results:
Informative genetic testing results were obtained for one hundred forty-seven patients, directly influencing at least one positive clinical outcome during the study period. Molecular findings prompted a change in clinical diagnosis through reverse phenotyping in forty-six percent of these informative cases. An identical proportion of patients received specific diagnosis-based treatments following the confirmation of their genetic status by the clinical team. An additional twenty-five patients had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) re-classified as a 'VUS-of-interest' which affected a positive outcome measure. The implementation of this workflow allowed twenty-seven percent of the cohort to avoid unnecessary immunosuppression therapies that carry significant side effects. Eighteen percent of participants were spared from invasive kidney biopsies due to the definitive molecular diagnoses provided by the genetic testing. Patients presenting with glomerular disease showed a significantly higher likelihood of receiving testing with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.23, whereas those with structural kidney disease were less likely to undergo genetic evaluation.
Conclusions:
The integration of a multidisciplinary nephrogenetics workflow provides a robust model for developing actionable clinical care plans for children. These findings suggest that informative molecular results are strongly associated with improved management of pediatric inherited kidney disease across diverse phenotypes. Clinicians can utilize these frameworks to optimize diagnostic accuracy and refine therapeutic interventions for young patients facing chronic renal challenges. The study highlights significant hurdles regarding universal access to combined nephrology and genetics expertise in many healthcare settings. Effective interpretation and communication of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) remain a primary challenge for clinical teams managing complex cases. Future efforts must focus on streamlining the return of results to ensure families receive comprehensive counseling and psychological support. This structured approach serves as a template for other pediatric centers seeking to implement precision medicine protocols within their existing infrastructure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on this study's findings, the workflow facilitates reverse phenotyping, which changed clinical diagnoses in 46% of informative cases. This structured approach allows clinicians to align therapeutic strategies with specific molecular causes, such as adjusting treatments or avoiding unnecessary immunosuppression in 27% of patients.
The researchers found that patients with glomerular disease were significantly more likely to receive testing, with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.23. In contrast, children with structural kidney disease were less likely to undergo genetic evaluation, showing an OR of 0.39 compared to other categories.
This classification allowed researchers to identify an additional 25 patients whose initially ambiguous results eventually influenced positive clinical outcomes. By tracking these variants over time, the team demonstrated that VUS re-interpretation is a fundamental component of an effective pediatric nephrogenetics workflow for managing inherited kidney disease.
The study's authors flag the limited access to combined nephrology and genetics expertise as a notable challenge for widespread implementation. The effective return of results and the complex interpretation of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) also represent ongoing constraints for clinical teams in this field.
The study's authors propose that this workflow serves as a model for creating actionable clinical care plans after genetic testing. They emphasize that future efforts should focus on improving the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) to maximize the utility of molecular diagnostics in pediatric clinics.
More Related Videos
09:30Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
Published on: August 17, 2022
12:22The Use of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays RPPA to Explore Protein Expression Variation within Individual Renal Cell Cancers
Published on: January 22, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care