Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
Published on: January 26, 2024
Impact of Modifiable Surgical Factors on Ossiculoplasty Outcomes After Controlling for Ear Environment Risk: A
Ryan T Judd, Michael B Gluth1, Richard K Gurgel2
1Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Objective:
To determine the impact of modifiable surgical factors on ossiculoplasty outcomes after controlling for ear environment risk.
Study Design:
Multi-institutional retrospective review.
Setting:
Six tertiary care centers from 2011 to 2019.
Patients:
Adults and children.
Interventions:
Ossiculoplasty, including synthetic ossicular replacement prosthesis, autograft interposition, bone cement repair, and mobilization.
Main Outcome Measure:
Correlation between modifiable surgical factors and pure-tone average air-bone gap (ABG) at most recent audiogram after controlling for preoperative risk using the statistically validated Ear Environment Risk (EER) score.
Results:
A total of 1,679 cases were included with a median follow-up time of 20 months (IQR, 5-51). After controlling for EER score, malleus engagement of prosthesis yielded favorable ABG versus direct contact to tympanic membrane without malleus engagement (beta = -2.4 dB [-3.8, -1.1], p < 0.001). For total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP), use of a footplate prosthesis yielded favorable ABG as compared with no footplate prosthesis (-3.6 dB [-6.1, -1.1], p = 0.005). For synthetic prostheses, polyethylene prostheses had a less favorable ABG compared with full titanium or titanium with hydroxyapatite prostheses ( p < 0.05). In cases where the malleus was not engaged in reconstruction, amputation of the malleus head yielded worse ABG (+3.9 dB [1.2, 6.7], p = 0.005). There was no significant difference ( p > 0.05) in ABG for single-stage versus multistaged approach, use of a cartilage cap over the prosthesis versus no cartilage, use of bone cement to secure a PORP to the stapes versus no cement, mastoid cavity obliteration versus no obliteration, and incudostapedial joint reconstruction with joint prosthesis/bone cement versus synthetic PORP.
Conclusions:
With statistical correction for ear environment risk, several modifiable surgical factors are noted to impact ossiculoplasty hearing outcomes.
Level Of Evidence:
4.

