Influences of current direction on 1 Hz motor cortex rTMS
Carolina Kanig1, Mirja Osnabruegge1, Florian Schwitzgebel2
1Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg 85577, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, Regensburg 93053, Germany.
Brain Research Bulletin
|July 29, 2025
Summary
Investigating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), this study found that the posterior-anterior to anterior-posterior (PA-AP) current direction significantly enhanced motor cortex plasticity markers. These findings highlight the importance of reporting stimulation parameters for rTMS reliability.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neuromodulation
- Motor Cortex Plasticity
Background:
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) effects are highly variable and lack replicability.
- Current direction is a known factor influencing rTMS aftereffects.
- Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing rTMS protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of current direction on cortical and peripheral markers of motor cortex plasticity induced by 1 Hz rTMS.
- To examine the correlation between cortical and peripheral markers.
- To identify potential confounding variables affecting rTMS outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-five healthy subjects received 2000 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS at 110% resting motor threshold.
- Stimulation was applied over the left motor hotspot in both anterior-posterior to posterior-anterior (AP-PA) and posterior-anterior to anterior-posterior (PA-AP) current directions.
- Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and transcranial evoked potentials (TEPs) were assessed before and after rTMS using single pulses, with coil placement guided by a neuronavigated robot-assisted setup.
Main Results:
- 1 Hz rTMS induced higher amplitudes of MEPs and TEP components (N15, N45, P60) and reduced N100 amplitude.
- The PA-AP current direction elicited stronger effects on MEPs and TEPs compared to AP-PA.
- Latency changes (prolonged MEP and N15, shortened N100) were more pronounced with PA-AP stimulation.
Conclusions:
- Findings indicate facilitatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS, contrasting with inhibitory assumptions.
- Current direction significantly influences rTMS-induced plasticity, supporting the activation of distinct neuronal populations.
- Accurate reporting and control of stimulation parameters like current direction are essential for enhancing rTMS reliability and replicability.
Keywords:
Cortical excitabilityCurrent directionMotor evoked potential (MEP)Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)Transcranial evoked potential (TEP)

