Related Experiment Videos
Grommets versus paracentesis in secretory otitis media. A prospective, controlled study
The American Journal of Otology
|November 1, 1985
Summary
Grommets significantly improve hearing in children with secretory otitis media, but can cause ear discharge and tympanosclerosis. Reinsertion may be needed for persistent middle ear effusion.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Medicine
- Audiology
Background:
- Secretory otitis media (SOM) is common in children, potentially leading to hearing loss.
- Effective management strategies for SOM are crucial to prevent long-term complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of grommet insertion versus paracentesis alone in treating bilateral SOM in children.
- To identify factors predicting persistent or recurrent SOM requiring further intervention.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 193 children with bilateral SOM underwent adenoidectomy, paracentesis, and unilateral grommet insertion (right ear only).
- Audiometric and tympanometric assessments were performed at 1-3 year follow-up.
- Pre- and perioperative factors were analyzed for correlation with treatment outcomes.
Main Results:
- Grommet insertion normalized hearing in the treated ear while functioning, with only 1% exceeding 30 dB HL compared to 20% without grommets.
- Adverse effects included aural discharge (14%) and tympanosclerosis (48% with grommets vs. 10% with paracentesis alone).
- Reinsertion was needed in 10% of right ears and 23% of left ears; granulating mucosa and effusion predicted recurrence.
Conclusions:
- Unilateral grommet insertion effectively restores hearing in children with SOM but carries risks of discharge and tympanosclerosis.
- Persistent middle ear effusion and specific intraoperative findings indicate a higher likelihood of requiring repeated treatment.
- Careful consideration of risks and benefits is necessary when deciding on grommet insertion for SOM.