Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

06:37
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023
4.1K
Wearable Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: Performance and Interpretability of Dynamic Neural Networks.
Dalius Navakauskas1, Martynas Dumpis1
1Department of Electronic Systems, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Plytines g. 25-234, LT-10105 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 30, 2025
Summary
This study compared dynamic neural networks for human activity recognition (HAR) using wearable sensors. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks achieved the highest accuracy, offering a balance between performance and interpretability for HAR applications.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Wearable Technology
Background:
- Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is crucial for healthcare, rehabilitation, and smart monitoring.
- Wearable sensor data offers a rich source for HAR, but selecting appropriate neural network architectures is key.
- Dynamic neural networks are promising for HAR due to their ability to model temporal dependencies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically compare the performance, computational cost, and interpretability of three dynamic neural network architectures for HAR.
- To evaluate Finite Impulse Response Neural Network (FIRNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) for HAR tasks.
- To apply Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) for enhanced model transparency in wearable sensor-based HAR.
Main Methods:
- Trained 16,500 models across varying delay lengths and hidden neuron counts for FIRNN, LSTM, and GRU.
- Evaluated models based on classification accuracy, computational complexity, and interpretability.
- Utilized Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) to analyze feature importance and model transparency.
Main Results:
- LSTM achieved the highest classification accuracy (98.76%), followed by GRU (97.33%) and FIRNN (95.74%).
- FIRNN demonstrated the lowest computational complexity.
- LRP analysis identified gyroscope Y-axis as the most informative sensor data, while accelerometer Y-axis was least informative; GRU showed broader relevance distribution than FIRNN.
Conclusions:
- LSTM and GRU offer superior accuracy for wearable sensor-based HAR compared to FIRNN.
- FIRNN provides computational efficiency, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments.
- The study provides practical guidance on balancing performance, complexity, and interpretability in explainable HAR models.

