Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
Published on: February 9, 2024
Alpine Meadow Fractional Vegetation Cover Estimation Using UAV-Aided Sentinel-2 Imagery
Kai Du1,2,3, Yi Shao1, Naixin Yao4
1Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Physical Geography and Environmental Process, College of Geographical Science, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China.
Abstract:
Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC) is a crucial indicator describing vegetation conditions and provides essential data for ecosystem health assessments. However, due to the low and sparse vegetation in alpine meadows, it is challenging to obtain pure vegetation pixels from Sentinel-2 imagery, resulting in errors in the FVC estimation using traditional pixel dichotomy models. This study integrated Sentinel-2 imagery with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data and utilized the pixel dichotomy model together with four machine learning algorithms, namely Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Deep Neural Network (DNN), to estimate FVC in an alpine meadow region. First, FVC was preliminarily estimated using the pixel dichotomy model combined with nine vegetation indices applied to Sentinel-2 imagery. The performance of these estimates was evaluated against reference FVC values derived from centimeter-level UAV data. Subsequently, four machine learning models were employed for an accurate FVC inversion, using the estimated FVC values and UAV-derived reference FVC as inputs, following feature importance ranking and model parameter optimization. The results showed that: (1) Machine learning algorithms based on Sentinel-2 and UAV imagery effectively improved the accuracy of FVC estimation in alpine meadows. The DNN-based FVC estimation performed best, with a coefficient of determination of 0.82 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.09. (2) In vegetation coverage estimation based on the pixel dichotomy model, different vegetation indices demonstrated varying performances across areas with different FVC levels. The GNDVI-based FVC achieved a higher accuracy (RMSE = 0.08) in high-vegetation coverage areas (FVC > 0.7), while the NIRv-based FVC and the SR-based FVC performed better (RMSE = 0.10) in low-vegetation coverage areas (FVC < 0.4). The method provided in this study can significantly enhance FVC estimation accuracy with limited fieldwork, contributing to alpine meadow monitoring on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.
More Related Videos
12:26Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
Published on: October 11, 2016
09:04Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands
Published on: August 29, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Light Acquisition
Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) Infrared Spectroscopy: Overview
The ATR process begins by directing a beam...