Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Preparation and Characterization of Graphene-Based 3D Biohybrid Hydrogel Bioink for Peripheral Neuroengineering
Published on: May 16, 2022
Impact of Poly(Lactic Acid) and Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite on Cellular Viability and Proliferation
Karina Torres Pomini1,2, Júlia Carolina Ferreira3, Laira Mireli Dias da Silva2
1Department of Human Morphophysiology, School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marília 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Although the nanocomposite of poly(L-lactic acid) with graphene oxide (PLLA-GO) shows promise for tissue engineering, its specific bioactive interactions with diverse cell lineages during early tissue regeneration remain unclear. This study comprehensively investigated the in vitro multifaceted biocompatibility of PLLA-GO using human fibroblasts (FN1 cells), murine mesenchymal stem cells (mBMSCs), and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Methods: Morphological analyses were performed using optical and scanning electron microscopy, while proliferation dynamics were assessed via CFSE staining. Cell cycle progression was evaluated using flow cytometry, mitochondrial activity was examined through TMRE staining, and inflammatory cytokine profiling was performed via Cytometric Bead Array (CBA). Results: PLLA-GO exhibited primary biocompatibility across all evaluated cell lines, characterized by efficient adhesion and proliferation. However, significant cell-type-dependent modulations were observed. The FN1 cells exhibited proliferative adaptation but induced accelerated scaffold degradation, as evidenced by a substantial increase in cellular debris (5.93% control vs. 34.38% PLLA-GO; p = 0.03). mBMSCs showed a transient initial proliferative response and a significant 21.66% increase in TNF-α production (179.67 pg/mL vs. 147.68 pg/mL in control; p = 0.03). HUVECs demonstrated heightened mitochondrial sensitivity, exhibiting a 32.19% reduction in mitochondrial electrical potential (97.07% control vs. 65.82% PLLA-GO; p ≤ 0.05), alongside reductions in pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α (8.73%) and IL-6 (12.47%). Conclusions: The PLLA-GO processing method is crucial for its properties and subsequent cellular interactions. Therefore, rigorous and specific preclinical evaluations-considering both cellular contexts and fabrication-are indispensable to ensure the safety and therapeutic potential of PLLA-GO in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

