Related Experiment Videos
Anaesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Anaesthesia
|November 1, 1985
Summary
Regional anesthesia with sedation is often preferred for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. General anesthesia is a suitable alternative when regional anesthesia is not possible, with careful patient monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Urology
Background:
- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a common procedure for kidney stones.
- Anesthetic management for ESWL requires careful consideration of patient factors and procedure specifics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe anesthetic considerations for patients undergoing ESWL.
- To compare regional anesthesia with general anesthesia for ESWL procedures.
Main Methods:
- Review of anesthetic techniques for ESWL.
- Discussion of regional anesthesia (epidural) versus general anesthesia.
- Consideration of patient transfer, postoperative analgesia, and specific patient populations (e.g., cardiac insufficiency).
Main Results:
- Regional anesthesia with sedation may be preferable to general anesthesia for ESWL.
- General anesthesia with controlled ventilation, muscle relaxation, narcotics, and low-concentration volatile anesthetics is a suitable alternative.
- Epidural anesthesia offers benefits like easier patient transfer and better postoperative pain relief, especially for multi-stage procedures or severe pain during stone passage.
Conclusions:
- Anesthetic choice for ESWL should balance procedure needs with patient benefits.
- Epidural anesthesia, utilizing a 'loss of resistance to saline' technique, can be advantageous for managing pain and facilitating multi-stage treatments.
- Patients with cardiac insufficiency require specialized anesthetic management due to immersion effects on hemodynamics.