Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
Published on: February 7, 2025
Evaluating the impact of common clinical confounders on performance of deep-learning-based sepsis risk assessment
Shikha Chaganti1, Vivek Singh1, Alasdair Edward Gent2
1Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Introduction:
Early identification of sepsis in the emergency department using machine learning remains a challenging problem, primarily due to the lack of a gold standard for sepsis diagnosis, the heterogeneity in clinical presentations, and the impact of confounding conditions.
Methods:
In this work, we present a deep-learning-based predictive model designed to enable early detection of patients at risk of developing sepsis, using data from the first 24 h of admission. The model is based on routine blood test results commonly performed on patients, including CBC (Complete Blood Count), CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel), lipid panels, vital signs, age, and sex. To address the challenge of label uncertainty as a part of the training process, we explore two different definitions, namely, Sepsis-3 and Adult Sepsis Event. We analyze the advantages and limitations of each in the context of patient clinical parameters and comorbidities. We specifically examine how the quality of the ground truth label influences the performance of the deep learning system and evaluate the effect of a consensus-based approach that incorporates both definitions. We also evaluated the model's performance across sub-cohorts, including patients with confounding comorbidities (such as chronic kidney, liver disease, and coagulation disorders) and those with infections confirmed by billing codes.
Results:
Our results show that the consensus-based model identifies at-risk patients in the first 24 h with 83.7% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 36% PPV, 97% NPV, and an AUC of 0.9. Our cohort-wise analysis revealed a high PPV (77%) in infection-confirmed subgroups and a drop in specificity across cohorts with confounding comorbidities (47-70%).
Discussion:
This work highlights the limitations of retrospective sepsis definitions and underscores the need for tailored approaches in automated sepsis detection, particularly when dealing with patients with confounding comorbidities.
Related Concept Videos
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...

