Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

177
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
177
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

192
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
192
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management01:29

Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

145
Diagnosing and managing appendicitis requires a structured and comprehensive approach that spans from initial assessment to postoperative care. Here is an overview of the process:
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
145
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management01:16

Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management

82
Postoperative Nursing Management for Kidney Transplant PatientsPostoperative nursing management care includes monitoring the surgical site, encouraging early movement, and promoting lung health through breathing exercises. Nurses also administer prescribed medications like H2-blockers, such as famotidine, or proton pump inhibitors, like omeprazole, to help prevent gastrointestinal ulcers and bleeding. Fungal infections in the mouth and bladder can result from immunosuppressive and antibiotic...
82
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

217
Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
217
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

144
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
144

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Faecal immunochemical test to triage patients with possible colorectal cancer symptoms: insights from the New Zealand FIT for symptomatic pilot.

Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Gastrointestinal dysfunction in critically ill patients: A prospective observational study of frequency, severity, risk factors, and outcomes.

Clinical nutrition ESPEN·2026
Same author

Microbial biomining from asteroidal material onboard the international space station.

NPJ microgravity·2026
Same author

Learning from complaints about surgical care: a large language model-assisted sequential methods analysis.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same author

Current and Emerging Techniques for Surgical Stabilisation of Rib Fractures: A Systematic Scoping Review.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle-How Chyme Reinfusion Before Intestinal Reconstruction Is Emerging as a New Standard of Care.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

380

Follow-Up Strategies in Colorectal Cancer: What Do Patients Prefer?

Gajan Srikumar1,2, Scott McLaughlin1,2, Matthew J McGuinness3

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora-Te Tai Tokerau, Northland, New Zealand.

ANZ Journal of Surgery
|July 30, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Colorectal cancer follow-up can be improved with patient-tailored strategies. Patients are open to alternative methods, but barriers like accessibility must be addressed for better patient experience.

Keywords:
colorectal cancerfollow‐upinterviewpatient preference

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.4K
Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
03:43

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

147

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

380
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.4K
Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
03:43

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

147

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Patient Experience
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Rising colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and healthcare pressures necessitate innovative follow-up strategies.
  • Current CRC follow-up methods lack clarity; a patient-centered approach may enhance experience and reduce costs.
  • Understanding patient perspectives is crucial for developing effective, patient-led CRC follow-up frameworks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore patient views on current and alternative colorectal cancer follow-up strategies.
  • To identify barriers and enablers influencing patient adherence to follow-up care.
  • To inform the development of a patient-guided framework for colorectal cancer follow-up.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews with 13 colorectal cancer survivors post-curative surgery.
  • Participants recruited from Northland, diverse in gender and ethnicity (including Māori).
  • Thematic analysis utilized the Braun and Clarke methodology for data interpretation.

Main Results:

  • Patients reported satisfaction and reassurance during conventional follow-up visits.
  • Openness to alternative follow-up methods, such as remote monitoring, was evident.
  • Barriers included accessibility and transport issues; enablers involved social support and transport access. GP follow-up concerns included continuity and access.

Conclusions:

  • Colorectal cancer patients generally have positive follow-up experiences and are receptive to alternative modalities.
  • Barriers to follow-up exist but can potentially be mitigated through a patient-tailored approach.
  • Patient-centered strategies are feasible and recommended for optimizing colorectal cancer follow-up care.