Improved Detection of Differentially Abundant Proteins through FDR-Control of Peptide-Identity-Propagation

The goal of proteomics is to identify and quantify peptides and proteins within a biological sample. Almost all algorithms for the identification of peptides in LC-MS/MS data employ two steps: peptide/spectrum matching and peptide-identity-propagation (PIP), also known as match-between-runs. PIP can routinely account for up to 40% of all results, with that proportion rising as high as 75% in single-cell proteomics. Unlike peptide identities derived through peptide/spectrum matches, for which error estimation has been strictly enforced for decades, peptide identities derived through PIP have not historically been subject to statistical evaluation. As an indispensable component of label-free quantification, PIP needs a statistically rigorous method for estimating its false-discovery rate (FDR). We present a method for FDR control of PIP, called PIP-ECHO, and devise a rigorous protocol for evaluating FDR control of any PIP method. Using three different benchmark data sets, we evaluate PIP-ECHO alongside the PIP procedures implemented by FlashLFQ, IonQuant, and MaxQuant. These analyses show that only PIP-ECHO can accurately control the FDR of PIP at 1% across all data sets. When analyzing a spike-in data set, PIP-ECHO increases both the accuracy and sensitivity of differential expression analysis, yielding substantially more differentially abundant proteins than either MaxQuant or IonQuant.