Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
Published on: May 5, 2015
Machine Learning-Based Cognitive Assessment With The Autonomous Cognitive Examination: Randomized Controlled Trial
Calvin Howard1,2,3,4, Amy Johnson5, Sheena Baratono1,2
1Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Boston, MA, 02215, United States.
Background:
The rising prevalence of dementia necessitates a scalable solution to cognitive assessments. The Autonomous Cognitive Examination (ACoE) is a foundational cognitive test for the phenotyping of cognitive symptoms across the primary cognitive domains. However, while the ACoE has been internally validated, it has not been externally validated in a clinical population, and its ability to render accurate appraisals of cognition is unknown. Further, it is unclear if these phenotypic assessments are useful in clinical tasks such as screening patients with and those without impairments.
Objective:
The objective of this study is to validate the ability of the ACoE to reliably phenotype cognition and to act as a screening examination relative to standard paper-based tests.
Methods:
To compare the evaluations of the ACoE to established paper-based tests, 46 patients with neurological disorders were enrolled in a randomized crossover study and received either the ACoE or a standard paper-based cognitive test. Patients received either the Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination-3 (ACE-3; n=35) or the Montreal Cognitive Examination (MoCA; n=11). We evaluated 3 primary metrics of the ACoE's performance relative to paper-based tests: (1) interrater reliability of overall cognitive scores, (2) interrater reliability of cognitive domain scores, and (3) ability to classify patients similarly to paper-based tests.
Results:
The ACoE's overall cognitive assessments were significantly reliable (ICC [intraclass correlation coefficient]=0.89; P<.001). Each cognitive domain's assessments were also significantly reliable, including attention (ICC=0.74; PFWE<.001), language (ICC=0.89; PFWE<.001), memory (ICC=0.91; PFWE<.001), fluency (ICC=0.74; PFWE<.001), and visuospatial function (ICC=0.78; PFWE<.001). The ACoE was also able to successfully diagnose patients similarly to both paper-based tests (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.96; PFWE<.001).
Conclusions:
In this study, we evaluated if the ACoE could reliably phenotype cognitive symptoms relative to the assessments of established standard paper-based cognitive assessments. We found that the ACoE reliably phenotypes patient cognition, which can be used to screen patients. In the future, these cognitive phenotypes may be used to diagnose specific etiologies.
More Related Videos
06:46Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage
Published on: August 4, 2018
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Self-Awareness and Its Effects
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect