Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.8K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in cardiovascular disease.

Current opinion in cardiology·2026
Same author

Focus on aging, heart failure, regeneration, and cardiovascular medicine.

Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology·2025
Same author

Dosimetric impact of material misassignment in linear Boltzmann transport equation-based external beam radiotherapy dose calculation.

Radiological physics and technology·2025
Same author

Nampt: a new therapeutic target for modulating NAD<sup>+</sup> levels in metabolic, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases.

Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology·2025
Same author

Peripheral dose assessment in radiation therapy using photon beams: experimental results with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter.

Radiological physics and technology·2025
Same author

Dosimetric impact of arc simulation angular resolution in single-isocentre multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery.

Radiological physics and technology·2025
Same journal

Proton RBE for in vivo model systems: LET and dose dependencies for early and late biological endpoints.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2026
Same journal

AI-augmented thyroid scintigraphy for robust classification of disease.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2026
Same journal

Updating national diagnostic reference levels for adult cardiac interventional procedures in Switzerland.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2026
Same journal

Adoption of AI-driven automation and adaptive radiotherapy in clinical practice: results from a national survey.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2026
Same journal

Sivan Unit (SU) for standardization of voxel intensity in CBCT: A multi-vendor, multi-centric validation study.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2026
Same journal

VIT-MBRT, a GPU accelerated Monte Carlo tool for investigations on preclinical minibeam radiation therapy.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K

Physics-informed machine learning for predicting MLC and gantry errors in VMAT: a feature engineering approach.

Perumal Murugan1, Ravikumar Manickam1

  • 1Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Physica Medica : PM : an International Journal Devoted to the Applications of Physics to Medicine and Biology : Official Journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
|July 30, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physics-informed machine learning accurately predicts errors in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery. Feature engineering significantly reduced positional errors, improving radiotherapy quality assurance.

Keywords:
Feature-engineeringFriction factorMachine-learningOptuna optimizationPredictive modellingSHAP analysis

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K
Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
14:08

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images

Published on: April 13, 2013

42.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K
Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
14:08

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images

Published on: April 13, 2013

42.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Machine Learning in Radiotherapy
  • Radiation Oncology

Background:

  • Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) involves complex delivery dynamics.
  • Accurate prediction of multileaf collimator (MLC) and gantry positional errors is crucial for VMAT quality assurance.
  • Existing methods may not fully capture the intricate physics of VMAT delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a physics-informed, feature-engineered machine learning (ML) framework for predicting MLC and gantry positional errors in VMAT.
  • To introduce novel physics-based parameters to improve predictive accuracy.
  • To compare the performance of different ML models for VMAT error prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized VMAT trajectory logs and DICOMRT plans from 32 TrueBeam linac treatments with HD120 MLC.
  • Extracted delivery dynamics and engineered physics-based features (friction, gravity, MLC speed-normalized).
  • Trained and optimized XGBoost, LightGBM, and deep neural networks (DNNs) using Optuna; evaluated feature importance with Spearman correlation, mutual information, and SHAP.

Main Results:

  • Identified systematic discrepancies between DICOM-RT and trajectory log data (7-8.5% deviations).
  • MLC speed was the dominant predictor (rs=0.891); physics-driven features showed significant correlations.
  • LightGBM and XGBoost achieved superior MLC error prediction (MAE: 0.0019 mm), reducing residual errors by 30%; DNNs performed less effectively.
  • Gantry error prediction accuracy was lower (MAE: 0.012°-0.015°).

Conclusions:

  • Domain knowledge integration in ML significantly enhances radiotherapy applications.
  • Physics-based feature engineering achieved a 30% reduction in VMAT positional errors.
  • Prioritizing feature space exploration alongside model optimization is recommended for VMAT quality assurance.