Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
Published on: June 1, 2015
How a first impression biases cognitive load assessments: Anchoring effects in problem-solving tasks of varying
Felix Krieglstein1, Manuel Schmitz2, Lukas Wesenberg3
1Psychology of Learning with Digital Media, Institute for Media Research, Faculty of Humanities, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany. felix.krieglstein@phil.tu-chemnitz.de.
The anchoring effect, a cognitive bias, may influence how students assess cognitive load, especially when initial task complexity sets a precedent for later judgments. This bias is more pronounced with significant contrasts between initial and subsequent assessments.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias where initial information heavily influences subsequent judgments.
- Its impact on cognitive load assessments, particularly in educational settings with repeated evaluations, remains unclear.
- Students may use heuristics for repeated, demanding cognitive load assessments during problem-solving.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if anchoring biases cognitive load assessments in students during problem-solving.
- To examine how task sequence and element interactivity affect this potential bias.
- To understand the conditions under which anchoring influences cognitive load evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments were conducted with 100, 87, and 80 students, respectively.
- Participants repeatedly assessed cognitive load during problem-solving tasks with varying element interactivity (low, moderate, high).
- Task sequences were manipulated to test the influence of initial complexity (anchor) on subsequent assessments.
Main Results:
- Results were mixed; Experiments 1 and 2 did not show a significant anchoring effect.
- Experiment 3 confirmed the anchoring effect, suggesting initial impressions influenced later cognitive load assessments.
- Other factors like subjective complexity, scale effects, and memory may also contribute.
Conclusions:
- Anchoring may influence cognitive load assessments, particularly when there's a notable contrast between the initial anchor and subsequent evaluations.
- Objective anchors (e.g., numerical values) might have a stronger impact than subjective ones.
- Further research is needed to disentangle anchoring from other contributing cognitive factors.
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
The Availability Heuristic
Fundamental Attribution Error
Framing Effects
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...