Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
Published on: June 1, 2015
How a first impression biases cognitive load assessments: Anchoring effects in problem-solving tasks of varying
Felix Krieglstein1, Manuel Schmitz2, Lukas Wesenberg3
1Psychology of Learning with Digital Media, Institute for Media Research, Faculty of Humanities, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany. felix.krieglstein@phil.tu-chemnitz.de.
None:
The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which people rely heavily on an initial piece of information when making judgments or decisions. Once an anchor - typically an objective numerical value - is set, subsequent assessments are adjusted around it, often insufficiently. The extent to which this effect influences cognitive load assessments is unclear. Particularly when students are required to assess cognitive load multiple times during problem-solving, they may resort to heuristics to simplify the cognitively demanding decision-making process. This experimental series aimed to investigate whether anchoring biases cognitive load assessments when students evaluated the cognitive load of several problem-solving tasks. Across three experiments (N1 = 100, N2 = 87, N3 = 80) students assessed the cognitive load of tasks with varying levels of element interactivity (low, moderate, high) multiple times during problem solving. Task sequences were varied to examine whether the first impression of complexity influenced subsequent assessments. The results were mixed: In Experiments 1 and 2, the first impression did not influence the following assessment, but Experiment 3 confirmed the hypothesized anchoring effect. However, this finding cannot be solely attributed to anchoring, as several factors - such as subjective perceptions of complexity, scale effects, task-specific differences, and memory and consistency effects - may have contributed. The findings suggest that anchoring is more likely to occur when there is a substantial contrast between the anchor and subsequent assessments. Furthermore, objective anchors, such as pre-defined numerical values, may exert a stronger influence on decision-making processes than subjective ones, like self-generated assessments.
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
The Availability Heuristic
Fundamental Attribution Error
Framing Effects
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...