Parallel Phase II Clinical Trials of Selinexor in Patients With Advanced Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma

Chul Kim1, Vanya Aggarwal1, Gedske Daugaard2

  • 1Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.

Abstract

Insights

Selinexor showed limited anticancer effects in advanced thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) after chemotherapy. High rates of treatment-related adverse events, such as anemia and nausea, led to frequent dose adjustments, complicating its use in TET patients.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), including thymomas and thymic carcinomas, are rare malignancies.
  • Limited effective treatment options exist for patients with advanced TETs progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy.
  • Selinexor, an inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1/CRM1), has shown preclinical antitumor activity, warranting clinical investigation for TETs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the safety and efficacy of selinexor in patients with advanced, inoperable thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).
  • To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of selinexor treatment.
  • To document treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and the need for dose modifications.

Main Methods:

  • Two parallel, nonrandomized, open-label phase II clinical trials (US and Europe) were conducted.
  • Patients with advanced TETs (thymoma or thymic carcinoma) with progressive disease after platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled.
  • Selinexor was administered at 60 mg twice weekly, with a dose reduction to 40 mg twice weekly initiated to improve tolerability.

Main Results:

  • A total of 31 patients (16 thymoma, 15 thymic carcinoma) were enrolled.
  • One complete response (thymic carcinoma) and two partial responses (thymoma) were observed, resulting in low overall response rates.
  • Common TRAEs included nausea, vomiting, anemia, fatigue, and asthenia; 64.5% of patients required dose reductions or interruptions due to adverse events.

Conclusions:

  • Selinexor demonstrated modest anticancer activity in pretreated advanced TETs.
  • The treatment was associated with a high incidence of TRAEs, necessitating frequent dose adjustments.
  • The trials were halted prematurely due to low overall response rates and budgetary constraints.