Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Impact of the MISSION Act on Quality and Outcomes of Major Cardiovascular Procedures Among Veterans
Jingyi Wu1,2, Genevieve P Kanter1,3,4, Todd H Wagner5,6
1Center for Healthcare Evaluation, Research, and Promotion/Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Importance:
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act expanded opportunities for veterans to obtain care outside the VA. However, the impact on health care outcomes is uncertain.
Objective:
To measure the MISSION Act's impact on travel times and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This retrospective difference-in-differences cohort study included veterans receiving nonemergent/nonurgent PCI, CABG, or AVR between October 2016 and September 2022 in non-VA hospitals under MISSION Act coverage or in VA hospitals in the 48 contiguous US states or the District of Columbia. Analyses were conducted in 2023-2024.
Exposures:
Veterans eligible for non-VA care under the MISSION Act by living far from ( >60 minutes) the nearest VA medical center vs veterans living near (≤60 minutes) a VA medical center.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as rehospitalization for cardiovascular cause or mortality within 30 days of the procedure, and travel times for care were the primary outcomes.
Results:
The cohort comprised veterans receiving PCI (n = 43 000; 42 066 [98%] male; mean [SD] age, 69 [8.8] years), CABG (n = 23 301; 22 197 [98%] male; mean [SD] age, 69 [7.7] years), or AVR (n = 14 682; 14 336 [98%] male; mean [SD] age, 74 [9.6] years). After MISSION implementation, mean PCI travel times increased by 1.3 minutes for near patients and decreased by 29.2 minutes for far patients (difference in differences, -30.5 minutes; P < .001). Mean CABG travel times increased by 9.4 minutes for near patients and decreased by 18.1 minutes for far patients (difference in differences, -27.4 minutes; P < .001). Mean travel times for AVR increased by 10.0 minutes for near patients and decreased by 23.0 minutes for far patients (difference in differences, -33.1 minutes; P < .001). After MISSION implementation, mean PCI MACE rates decreased by 0.5 percentage points for near patients and increased by 2.3 percentage points for far patients (difference in differences, 2.8 percentage points; P <.001). Mean CABG MACE rates decreased by 6.5 percentage points for near patients and increased by 1.6 percentage points for far patients (difference in differences, 8.1 percentage points; P < .001). AVR MACE rates were not statistically different between the groups (P = .45).
Conclusions And Relevance:
MISSION Act implementation was associated with substantial decreases in travel times among veterans who became geographically eligible for non-VA care. For these patients undergoing PCI or CABG, MISSION Act implementation was also associated with worsened 30-day MACE rates.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...