Experimental study on factors influencing low identification rates and spectral quality of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Hyunseul Choi1, Minhee Kang1, You-Keun Ko2

  • 1Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Smart Healthcare Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Microbiology Spectrum
|July 31, 2025
PubMed

Insights

The Sepsityper Kit shows a low identification rate for Streptococcus pneumoniae due to its lysis buffer damaging bacterial cells. Replacing lysis and washing buffers with phosphate-buffered saline significantly improves identification accuracy for this pathogen.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Bacterial Pathogenesis
  • Diagnostic Technology

Background:

  • The MBT Sepsityper Kit (Sepsityper) is widely used for identifying pathogens in bloodstream infections via MALDI-TOF MS.
  • A significant challenge is its low identification rate for *Streptococcus pneumoniae*.
  • The reasons for this low identification rate remain unclear, impacting timely diagnosis and treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate factors contributing to the low identification rate of *Streptococcus pneumoniae* using the Sepsityper.
  • To evaluate the impact of blood culture bottle type, blood culture system, MALDI-TOF MS platform, lysis buffer volume, and sample preparation on identification rates.
  • To identify potential modifications to improve *S. pneumoniae* detection.

Main Methods:

  • Controlled experiments simulating bloodstream infections were conducted.
  • Five factors were systematically varied: blood culture bottle type, blood culture system, MALDI-TOF MS platform, lysis buffer volume, and sample preparation method.
  • The Sepsityper protocol was modified by replacing lysis and washing buffers with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

Main Results:

  • Anaerobic blood culture bottles showed a higher identification rate (5.6%) compared to aerobic bottles (0%).
  • The lysis buffer in the Sepsityper protocol significantly altered bacterial cell morphology, leading to poor *S. pneumoniae* identification.
  • Replacing the lysis buffer with PBS markedly improved identification rates, whereas other tested factors showed no significant impact.

Conclusions:

  • The lysis buffer is a critical factor responsible for the low identification rate of *Streptococcus pneumoniae* with the Sepsityper.
  • Modifying the Sepsityper protocol by using phosphate-buffered saline instead of lysis and washing buffers offers a promising workaround for improved *S. pneumoniae* detection.
  • Further optimization of diagnostic protocols is needed to enhance the accurate and timely identification of *S. pneumoniae* in clinical settings.