Commentary on 'The Julian Assange case and its implications for expert witness evidence' - Damned if you do ………

A number of the issues raised by Professor Kopelman in his Viewpoint are discussed and used to make recommendations that should enable psychiatrists better to assist the courts, uphold the expert witness's expectation of integrity, reduce the risk of judicial criticism and adverse publicity, provide clarity as to how to proceed when there is, or is perceived to be, a conflict between the duty as a doctor and the duty as an expert, particularly in cases involving safeguarding issues, and promote the medicolegal discourse necessary for the medical and legal professions to work together harmoniously in the interests of justice.