Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
Perinatal Outcomes According to Treatment Targets for Gestational Diabetes: A Multi-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study
Stephanie L Montalto1, Melvin Marzan2, Christine Houlihan1
1Mercy Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
Tighter fasting blood glucose targets for gestational diabetes (GDM) did not improve infant outcomes but increased medication use. This study compared outcomes for GDM pregnancies with tighter versus less tight glucose control.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Endocrinology
- Perinatal Medicine
Background:
- Gestational diabetes (GDM) affects 18% of pregnancies in Australia, potentially causing large for gestational age (LGA) infants and other complications.
- Optimal treatment targets for GDM remain undefined, highlighting a critical gap in clinical guidelines.
- Current GDM management lacks consensus on the ideal fasting blood glucose level (BGL) targets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare perinatal outcomes in women with GDM treated to tighter versus less tight fasting blood glucose level (BGL) targets.
- To evaluate the association between different GDM BGL targets and the incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) infants.
- To assess the impact of GDM BGL targets on the need for pharmacotherapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 25,041 births in 12 metropolitan Victorian hospitals (2020-2022).
- Inclusion criteria: term singleton infants with GDM diagnosis.
- Comparison of outcomes between 'tighter' (BGL < 5.0-5.2 mmol/L) and 'less tight' (BGL < 5.5-5.6 mmol/L) fasting BGL target groups, using multilevel Poisson regression with inverse probability treatment weighting.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in LGA births between tighter (10.4%) and less tight (9.5%) BGL target groups (p=0.85).
- Increased insulin treatment in the tighter BGL target group (53% vs. 35%, p<0.001).
- No significant differences observed in secondary perinatal outcomes between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Tighter fasting BGL targets in GDM pregnancies are not associated with improved perinatal outcomes.
- Implementing tighter BGL targets leads to a higher likelihood of requiring pharmacotherapy, such as insulin.
- The findings suggest that current tighter fasting BGL targets for GDM may not offer clinical benefits regarding infant size and increase medical intervention rates.
Background:
Gestational diabetes (GDM) is currently diagnosed in approximately 18% of pregnancies in Australia. GDM may lead to infants being born large for gestational age (LGA), and other complications. There is currently no consensus on optimal treatment targets.
Aims:
This study aims to compare perinatal outcomes in patients with GDM when treated according to tighter or less tight fasting blood glucose level (BGL) targets.
Methods:
Our retrospective cohort study included data from all 12 metropolitan public hospitals providing maternity care in Victoria between January 2020 and December 2022. Women who gave birth to a term singleton infant and who had a diagnosis of GDM were included. Women were grouped according to their delivery hospitals' fasting BGL targets: 'tighter' (< 5.0-5.2 mmol/L) or 'less tight' (< 5.5-5.6 mmol/L). The primary outcome was LGA and a range of secondary outcomes were compared. Inverse probability treatment weights were calculated based on sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors. We then performed multilevel Poisson regression with delivery hospitals as random intercept.
Results:
There were 25 041 births included, 12 423 (49.6%) in the 'tighter' target group, and 12 618 (50.4%) in the 'less tight' group. After adjusting for hospital and maternal demographics, there was no difference in LGA births (10.4% in 'tighter' vs. 9.5% in 'less tight' (p = 0.85)). More women received insulin treatment in the 'tighter' group (53%) compared to 'less tight' (35%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.
Conclusion:
Tighter fasting BGL targets were not associated with improved perinatal outcomes but were associated with an increase in pharmacotherapy.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications

