Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
Personalized sudden cardiac death risk prediction in genetic heart diseases: Beyond one-size-fits-all
Myrthe Y C van der Heide1, Tom E Verstraelen1, Arthur A M Wilde2
1Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Predicting sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in genetic heart disease is crucial. Current methods may overestimate risk, leading to unnecessary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) procedures. Dynamic models and disease-specific endpoints are needed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Accurate prediction of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in patients with genetic heart diseases is vital for appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation.
- Existing risk prediction tools face challenges due to diverse arrhythmic substrates and statistical modeling limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current challenges in SCD risk prediction for genetic heart diseases.
- To address the overestimation of SCD risk by surrogate endpoints like appropriate ICD therapy.
- To highlight the limitations of static risk models and advocate for dynamic risk assessment.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on SCD prediction models in genetic heart diseases.
- Analysis of challenges posed by surrogate endpoints and static risk models.
- Discussion of potential solutions including disease-specific endpoints and dynamic modeling.
Main Results:
- Current surrogate endpoints, such as appropriate ICD therapy, can lead to overestimation of true SCD risk.
- This overestimation may result in unnecessary ICD implantation and associated complications in low-risk individuals.
- Most risk prediction models are static and fail to capture temporal variations in individual risk.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need for disease-specific surrogate endpoints in genetic heart disease to improve SCD risk prediction accuracy.
- Development and implementation of dynamic risk models are essential to reflect evolving individual risk over time.
- Adopting these advancements will optimize ICD implantation decisions and patient outcomes.
Abstract:
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk prediction in genetic heart diseases is essential to identify patients who will benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Although many prediction tools have been developed, risk prediction remains challenging due to variability in underlying arrhythmic substrates and statistical modeling approaches. This review addresses 2 major challenges in current clinical practice. First, the use of surrogate SCD end points, such as appropriate ICD therapy, can potentially and actually does lead to overestimation of the "true" SCD risk. This may result in unnecessary ICD implantation in low-risk patients and exposing them to device-related complications. Second, most risk models are static and do not account for temporal changes in risk. We provide an overview of SCD prediction models and offer recommendations to address these challenges. This review underscores the need for disease-specific surrogate end points and dynamic risk models that reflect individual risk over time.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

