Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dichoptic priming effects on ambiguous picture processing.

L A Owen

    British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
    |November 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Unconscious priming effects from masked pictures can influence how people interpret ambiguous images. This suggests pattern masking hinders conscious awareness but not underlying perceptual processing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Abstinence from smoking and expired-air carbon monoxide levels: lactose intolerance as a possible source of error.

    American journal of public health·1990
    Same author

    How effective are your cones?

    The X-ray technician·1958
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Visual Perception
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • The role of conscious awareness in visual perception is debated.
    • Pattern masking is often used to limit conscious visual processing.
    • Previous research suggests pattern masking may not fully block perception.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether subliminally presented pictures can prime the interpretation of ambiguous images.
    • To determine if pattern masking prevents perceptual processing or conscious report.
    • To explore priming effects under dichoptic and interocular masking conditions.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted using pattern masking techniques.
    • Experiment 1 utilized dichoptic masking.
    • Experiment 2 involved presenting primes to one eye and ambiguous images to the other (interocular transfer).

    Main Results:

    • Masked pictures, even without conscious representation, influenced the interpretation of ambiguous images.
    • Priming effects were observed under both dichoptic and interocular masking conditions.
    • Pattern masking did not prevent perceptual processing but may hinder conscious report recovery.

    Conclusions:

    • Pattern masking does not eliminate perceptual processing, supporting recent claims.
    • The findings suggest a dissociation between perceptual processing and conscious awareness.
    • Results are discussed in the context of current models of visual picture processing.

    Related Experiment Videos