Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
Published on: May 24, 2017
Identifying and Understanding Use Trajectories of Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes
Nadra E Lisha1,2, Manali Vora3, Benjamin W Chaffee1,2,4
1UCSF Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, San Francisco, California, USA.
Background:
The rising use of e-cigarettes, particularly dual use with cigarettes, necessitates understanding usage patterns and identifying participant and product characteristics that influence behaviors to guide tobacco regulatory decisions.
Methods:
Analysis included adults (≥18 years) from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort. Participants were classified into six e-cigarette/cigarette category at each of waves 1-5 (2013-2019). Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify distinct trajectories of cigarette and e-cigarette use patterns over time in Mplus. Random forest was used to examine the importance of baseline participant and product characteristics in predicting the distinct groups of use trajectories. Within each cigarette class, odds ratios and 95% CIs of the top 15 predictors of e-cigarette use group were calculated in multinomial logistic regression controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and education.
Results:
Four cigarette-use trajectories were identified: "Cigarette never smokers" (31.3%), "Past experimental cigarette smokers" (23.8%), "Current experimental cigarette smokers" (18.8%), and "Current cigarette smokers" (26.0%). E-cigarette-use trajectories included "Never users" (53.6%), "Past progressors" (32.3%), and "Current progressors" (14.3%). Random forest highlighted common and unique predictors across cigarette-use groups. For example, perceptions of e-cigarette harm relative to cigarettes strongly predicted e-cigarette progression among current smokers, whereas younger age and higher social media use were more relevant among never and past smokers.
Conclusions:
Distinct cigarette and e-cigarette use trajectories were identified, with predictors varying by cigarette-use group. These findings underscore the importance of targeted regulatory strategies based on subgroup-specific behaviors and characteristics.
More Related Videos
08:39Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies
Published on: August 25, 2018
09:30A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol
Published on: January 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Stimulants
Ganglionic stimulants activate NM nicotinic receptors in autonomic ganglia, falling into two categories: nicotine mimetics [e.g., lobeline, dimethylpiperazine, tetramethylammonium] and muscarinic receptor agonists [e.g., muscarine, methacholine]. The first category's action is rapid and blocked by nicotinic receptor antagonists, while the second category's action is delayed and blocked by atropine-like agents. Nicotine, an alkaloid, affects the heart rate by stimulating...