Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Cone-shaped Double-hole Method with Dual-plane Probe Guidance
Published on: June 6, 2025
Review of Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Outcomes
Evan Suzman1, B Malik Wahba1, Gal Wald1
1Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract:
More than 2 million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA and Europe, but there is debate over the optimal approach. The procedural time is shorter for transrectal (TR) than for transperineal (TP) biopsy, but prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that TR biopsy has a greater risk of infectious complications and inferior cancer detection rates. As a result, professional guideline recommendations are shifting in favor of TP biopsy. Nevertheless, the TR approach still accounts for the majority of biopsies performed worldwide. Barriers to TP biopsy adoption include limited training opportunities, longer procedure duration, and higher costs in comparison to TR biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY: A prostate biopsy is carried out for patients who have a suspicion for prostate cancer, but there is debate over the best biopsy approach. Transrectal (TR) biopsy takes less time than transperineal (TP) biopsy. Trials have shown that TR biopsy has a higher risk of infectious complications and a similar cancer detection rate. Guidelines are therefore shifting in favor of TP biopsy, although limited training opportunities, the longer procedure time, and higher costs are barriers to more widespread use of this approach.
More Related Videos
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
05:32Povidone Iodine Rectal Preparation at Time of Prostate Needle Biopsy is a Simple and Reproducible Means to Reduce Risk of Procedural Infection
Published on: September 21, 2015