Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Preparation of SNS CobaltII Pincer Model Complexes of Liver Alcohol Dehydrogenase
Published on: March 19, 2020
DFT investigation of metal coordination and reactivity in minimal metalloenzyme models
Rajeev Kumar1, Youngsuk Kim2, Jeong-Mo Choi1
1Department of Chemistry and Chemistry Institute for Functional Materials, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Metalloenzymes achieve catalytic functionality by precisely controlling their metal coordination environments through structural constraints. However, the influence of structural rigidity on metal substitution and its impact on enzyme structure and reactivity has not been fully elucidated. To address this, we investigated how structural constraints affect metal coordination geometry, energetics, and reactivity within the active site of human carbonic anhydrase II (CA II) using DFT. We constructed semi-constrained models of metal substituted CA II from their X-ray crystal structures containing Zn2+ (native), Cu2+, Ni2+, and Co2+. Semi-constrained models were constructed to mimic the microenvironment of the protein active site, and multiple DFT methods were benchmarked to identify an accurate and efficient computational approach. Structural constraints lead to a rugged energy landscape with multiple local minima, and we found that upon metal substitutions, the competition between the structural constraints and the intrinsic coordination chemistry leads to diverse consequences in final geometry. We also found that the native metal ion (Zn2+) in metalloenzymes CA II does not always exhibit the strongest binding among the metal ions tested; instead, the trends follow the Irving-Williams series. However, electrophilicity analysis revealed that constrained geometries modulate the electronic reactivity of the metal center, with Zn2+ consistently exhibiting the highest electrophilicity, and this explains the evolutionary optimization of the metalloenzyme. These findings enhance our understanding of metal coordination under structural constraints and provide a computational basis for exploring metal substitutions in artificial metalloenzymes.
More Related Videos
14:44Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
Published on: December 16, 2013
11:04Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Determining the Structure and Mechanisms of Metal Ion Recognition and Redox Activity of Metal Binding Oligopeptides
Published on: September 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Valence Bond Theory
Coordination Number and Geometry
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...