Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Entanglement of spin transition and structural adaptability: manipulating the slow spin equilibrium by the
Yuqiao Chai1, Yu-Ting Yang1,2, Jin-Peng Xue2,3
1School of Material and Chemical Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology Ningbo Zhejiang 315211 China.
Abstract:
A comprehensive analysis of physical and chemical properties using the same family of spin-crossover complexes is crucial for understanding and designing structure-property relationships. However, finding an appropriate system remains challenging. Here, a series of guest-saturated states based on the 2D Hofmann-type framework [FeII(prentrz)2PdII(CN)4]·guest (prentrz = (1E,2E)-3-phenyl-N-(4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)prop-2-en-1-imine; 1·guest) is reported, exhibiting a guest-manipulated slow dynamic effect on spin equilibrium in an incomplete two-step spin-crossover (SCO) process. Using a full-sealed method by modulating the mixing ratios and types of CH3OH, H2O, and D2O, the stable maintenance of guest-saturated states allows fine-tuning of the elastic frustration (ξ) of the framework to realize SCO behaviors in the unexplored region between one-step incomplete (HS0.5LS0.5 ↔ HS) and two-step complete (LS ↔ HS0.5LS0.5 ↔ HS) processes. In the semi-sealed method, guest molecules gradually escape from the material until the guest-saturated state disappears. This continuous loss shifts the slow spin equilibrium from a state that is difficult to switch to one that fully completes the transition. The study demonstrates that guest molecule modulation is more controllable than structural deformation effects on elastic frustration, offering a pathway to discover hidden types of SCO materials and develop new stimulus-responsive materials.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...

