Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
Evaluating von mises stress distribution and deformation patterns in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures- a finite
Sathish Radhakrishna1, Sonakshi Prakash2, Sundar S Shyam1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, 570015, India.
Purpose:
The ZMC provides essential midfacial support through its tetrapod configuration and current clinical practice lacks consensus on optimal fixation techniques for displaced fractures. This study compared stress distribution and deformation patterns across different ZMC fracture fixation methods to provide biomechanical guidance for clinical decision-making.
Methods:
This finite element analysis (FEA) study was conducted using computer-generated ZMC models derived from CBCT scans of normal anatomy. Four distinct configurations were tested: intact ZMC (control), two-point fixation at frontozygomatic suture and buttress (FZ + buttress), two-point fixation at infraorbital rim and frontozygomatic suture (IOR + FZ), and three-point fixation incorporating all three sites. Standardized loading conditions (450 N occlusal force perpendicular to maxillary first molar and 150 N masticatory muscle force) were applied and material properties were defined by Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio for bone and titanium components. Comparative analysis of von Mises stress (MPa) and maximum deformation (mm) values was performed using Ansys (2019) software.
Results:
The intact ZMC established a baseline. Two-point FZ + IOR fixation demonstrated the lowest stress values (0.25 MPa), while both two-point fixation. methods showed less deformation than three-point fixation. Three-point fixation exhibited the highest deformation (0.0066 mm) with elevated stress values (0.26 MPa), offering no significant advantage over two-point approaches.
Conclusion:
FZ + Buttress fixation provides optimal stability against masticatory forces, while FZ + Infraorbital fixation offers balanced stability for minimally displaced fractures. Three-point fixation showed no advantage over two-point approaches despite additional hardware. These findings support a conservative surgical approach with minimal hardware for stable reduction, potentially reducing operative time, soft tissue dissection, and complications.
Related Concept Videos
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Plastic Deformations of Members with a Single Plane of Symmetry
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Components of Stress
Interestingly, the hidden cube faces also experience these stresses, equal and...
Flexural Stress
Hooke's Law states that within the material's elastic limits, stress is directly proportional to strain. In a member experiencing a bending moment, the strain at any point is relative to...
Plastic Deformations

