Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025
Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Hypertensive vs. normotensive blood pressure response to advanced conduction disorders: comparison of baseline
Katia Orvin1,2, Shelly Vons1,2, Alon Barsheshet1,2
1Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Jabotinski St. 39, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel.
Aims:
Patients with advanced conduction disorders exhibit diverse haemodynamic profiles, from cardiogenic shock to severe hypertension. Peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) significantly contributes to compensatory mechanisms during bradycardia. This study aimed to assess the haemodynamic responses of patients presenting with high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block.
Methods And Results:
We retrospectively analyzed 261 consecutive patients with advanced conduction disorders who underwent pacemaker implantation from October 2020 to December 2022. Patients were classified into three groups: normotensive (<160 mmHg), hypertensive (≥160 mmHg), and unstable (requiring emergent temporary pacing). Additionally, 73 stable patients underwent non-invasive haemodynamic assessment. Of 261 patients, 99 (37.9%) were normotensive, 118 (45.2%) hypertensive, and 44 (16.9%) unstable. Hypertensive patients frequently had hypertension history (77.1%), presented with higher escape rhythms (39.1 ± 6.7 vs. 31.5 ± 10.4 and 38.1 ± 9.9 in unstable and normotensive patients, respectively), and exhibited higher ejection fractions (58.2 ± 8 vs. 53.2 ± 12 and 53.9 ± 11, respectively). They demonstrated fewer low cardiac output signs, including acute kidney injury and elevated lactate levels. PVR was significantly elevated in the hypertensive group. The unstable group experienced the highest 30-day mortality and higher 1-year mortality, though the latter did not reach statistical significance. Factors independently associated with a hypertensive response included higher heart rate, higher ejection fraction, and calcium channel blocker pre-treatment.
Conclusion:
Haemodynamic presentations in high-degree AV block are heterogeneous. A hypertensive response represents a distinct clinical phenotype characterized by preserved cardiac function, higher escape rhythms, increased PVR, and fewer end-organ hypoperfusion signs.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
01:18Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
01:19Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
01:29Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology