Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Resolving Water, Proteins, and Lipids from In Vivo Confocal Raman Spectra of Stratum Corneum through a Chemometric Approach
Published on: September 26, 2019
Global Approach for Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (GRASS) Survey
Moneerah AlGassim1, Shanti Narayanasamy2, Sara Vogrin MBiostat3
1Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Medical Specialties Department, King Fahad Medical City, Central Second Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Background:
Consensus guidelines outline the recommended management of delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs), but clinical practices are largely expert-based and may vary significantly across populations and regions. This study evaluated the approach and management of health care specialists globally regarding DHRs, including severe cutaneous adverse reactions.
Objective:
To assess the current practices, knowledge, and availability of allergy testing for DHRs, including severe cutaneous adverse reactions, among relevant health care professionals globally.
Methods:
The Global AppRoAch for Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Survey study is a prospective, web-based survey conducted using the Research Electronic Data Capture platform. The 10- to 15-minute survey was directed to 14 allergy/immunology and dermatology associations through international mailing lists across 48 countries.
Results:
Among the 8561 members contacted, answers from 130 health care providers practicing in all 6 continents were analyzed. Most respondents identified as White (88 of 130 [68%]) and female (79 of 130 [61%]), representing a range of age groups and clinical expertise. Most practiced in dermatology (69 of 130 [53%]), followed by allergy/immunology (46 of 130 [35.4%]), and were based in an urban setting (127 of 130 [98%]). Among the 45 respondents (34.6%) who managed severe cutaneous adverse reactions, 27 (60%) had access to multidisciplinary care. Practices varied widely by clinical phenotype; for example, for maculopapular exanthema, 63 respondents indicated treating through the reaction (63 of 130 [49%]), whereas 16 (16 of 130 [12%]) offered desensitization. Under patient education and follow-up, only 60 (60 of 130 [46.2%]) participants organized a follow-up with the implicated specialist.
Conclusions:
Significant variability in the management of DHRs was observed among the respondents. The results highlight the need for evidence-based protocols to standardize guidelines for managing DHRs.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Allergic Drug Reactions
Allergic Reactions
Hypersensitivities
Types of Hypersensitivities
Hypersensitivity reactions are categorized into four types: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4. Each type has a distinct mechanism...
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...

