Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Delays reduce culprit-presence detection but do not affect guessing-based selection in response to lineups
Amelie Therre1, Raoul Bell2, Nicola Marie Menne2
1Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Amelie.Therre@hhu.de.
Conducting police lineups sooner after a crime significantly improves eyewitnesses' ability to detect the actual culprit. Delays reduce accuracy, but witnesses do not increase guessing, highlighting the need for prompt identification procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Forensic Science
- Eyewitness Identification
Background:
- Police lineups are crucial for eyewitness identification but are often conducted after varying delays.
- Crime-to-lineup delays may negatively impact the accuracy of identifying both the presence and absence of a suspect.
- Such delays could potentially influence eyewitnesses to resort to guessing when making selections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different crime-to-lineup delays on eyewitness identification accuracy.
- To examine how detection of culprit presence and guessing-based selection change over time.
- To determine the optimal timing for conducting police lineups to maximize memory-based detection.
Main Methods:
- Participants viewed a staged crime video.
- They subsequently completed simultaneous photo lineups after immediate, one-day, one-week, or one-month delays.
- Data on culprit-presence detection and guessing-based selection were analyzed across delay conditions.
Main Results:
- A significant decrease in the probability of detecting the culprit's presence was observed as delay increased.
- This decline followed a power function, with the most rapid decrease occurring at shorter delays.
- The probability of guessing-based selection remained constant across all delay intervals.
Conclusions:
- The accuracy of eyewitness identification significantly diminishes with increasing crime-to-lineup delays.
- Eyewitnesses do not compensate for reduced detection accuracy by increasing their guessing rate.
- Conducting police lineups as soon as possible after a crime is critical for maximizing accurate, memory-based culprit detection.
More Related Videos
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
05:58Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Social Facilitation
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Hindsight Biases
The Availability Heuristic
Fundamental Attribution Error