Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Using Life Stories to Support Patient-Centered Care: A Narrative Review of Implementation and Impact
Meghna Tummala1, Lynn McNicoll2
1The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. meghna_tummala@brown.edu.
Abstract:
My Life, My Story (MLMS) is a narrative medicine initiative that was initially developed to collect patients' life stories with the goal of supporting patient-centered healthcare delivery in the Veterans Affairs health system and has since spread to various healthcare settings across the country. Despite widespread intervention, there has been little research published on MLMS. We conducted a narrative review to better understand the nature of MLMS implementation, its impact on providers and patients, and gaps in knowledge. We found that, while there is great variation in the implementation of MLMS, all projects share a similar framework that includes a patient-driven interview process about their life story, the interviewer's writing of the story from the patient's perspective, story revision based on patient feedback, and its final dissemination in the electronic health record and to the patient. Notably, while MLMS initiatives involve veteran and non-veteran individuals, the typical MLMS participant is older and white. Additionally, research on patient outcomes is sparse with a few studies showing that the experience is enjoyable for patients, can support the disclosure of information to providers that patients deem relevant to their healthcare, and may increase patient satisfaction with care. We found that providers had mostly positive experiences with MLMS and felt it could support care provision to a patient's individual context. Healthcare trainees also benefited, with studies demonstrating the development of empathy skills. Overall, research is limited given that existing work has not adequately explored the patient perspective and potential drawbacks of MLMS, especially in patients who have marginalized identities. We suggest future research should take a more nuanced, longitudinal, and qualitative approach to the impact of the initiative on patients, beyond the evaluation of generic, Likert-style positive measures, to better understand if and how MLMS can truly be a patient-centered initiative.
More Related Videos
06:25Capturing Representative Hand Use at Home Using Egocentric Video in Individuals with Upper Limb Impairment
Published on: December 23, 2020
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...