Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
Integrated multi-omics analysis and machine learning identify G protein-coupled receptor-related signatures for
Duo Wang1,2,3, Jihao Tu1,2, Jianfeng Liu1,2
1Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Orthopedics Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Background:
G protein-coupled receptors (GPRs) are associated with tumor development and prognosis. However, there were fewer reports of GPR-related signatures (GPRSs) in soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), and we aim to combine GPR-related genes with cellular landscape to construct diagnostic and prognostic models in STSs.
Methods:
Based on AddModuleScore, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), GPR-related genes (GPRs) were screened at both the single-cell and bulk RNA-seq levels based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. We developed a novel machine learning framework that incorporated 12 machine learning algorithms and their 127 combinations to construct a consensus GPRS to screen biomarkers with diagnostic significance and clinical translation, which was assessed by the internal and external validation datasets. Moreover, the GPR-TME classifier as the prognosis model was constructed and further performed for immune infiltration, functional enrichment, somatic mutation, immunotherapy response prediction, and scRNA-seq analyses.
Results:
We identified 151 GPR-related genes at both the single-cell and bulk transcriptome levels, and identified a Stepglm[both]+Enet[alpha=0.6] model with seven GPR-related genes as the final diagnostic predictive model with high accuracy and translational relevance using a 127-combination machine learning computational framework, and the GPR-integrated diagnosis nomogram provided a quantitative tool in clinical practice. Moreover, we identified seven prognosis GPRs and five prognosis-good immune cells constructing the GPR score and TME score, respectively. The findings indicate that high expression of GPRs is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with STS, highlighting the significant role of GPRs and the tumor microenvironment (TME) in STS development. Building up a GPR-TME classifier, low GPR combined with high TME exhibited the most favorable prognosis and immunotherapeutic efficacy, which was further performed for immune infiltration, functional enrichment, somatic mutation, immunotherapy response prediction, and scRNA-seq analyses.
Conclusions:
Our study constructed a GPRS that can serve as a promising tool for diagnosis and prognosis prediction, targeted prevention, and personalized medicine in STS.
More Related Videos
09:01Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts from Mouse Mammary Tumors as Tools for Molecular and Computational Studies
Published on: July 3, 2025
09:33Author Spotlight: Finding New Therapeutic Targets for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Through Genome-Scale shRNA Screens
Published on: August 25, 2023