Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Accuracy of cath lab activation decisions for STEMI-equivalent and mimic ECGs: Physicians vs. AI (Queen of Hearts by
Steven Shroyer1, Sumeru Mehta1, Nandish Thukral2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Greater San Antonio Emergency Physicians, Methodist Hospital System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Insights
Physicians struggle with interpreting complex ECGs for occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI), leading to potential misclassification. An AI algorithm, Queen of Hearts AI, showed significantly higher accuracy in identifying OMI requiring catheterization laboratory activation (CLA).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Accurate electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is vital for identifying occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) and guiding immediate catheterization laboratory activation (CLA).
- STEMI-equivalent and STEMI-mimic ECG patterns present diagnostic challenges, potentially leading to misclassification of OMI.
- The diagnostic accuracy of physicians for these complex ECG presentations remains largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess physician accuracy in interpreting STEMI-equivalent and STEMI-mimic ECGs for CLA decisions.
- To compare physician performance against a machine learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm, Queen of Hearts AI (QoH AI).
Main Methods:
- Fifty-three electrophysiologists and 42 cardiologists interpreted 18 ECGs (including STEMI-equivalents, STEMI-mimics, STEMI, and normal controls).
- Interpretations aimed to identify OMI requiring immediate CLA.
- ECGs were also analyzed by QoH AI, with interpretations compared to a reference standard (angiography, troponin, echocardiography, clinical follow-up).
Main Results:
- Physician interpretation accuracy was similar between electrophysiologists (65.6%) and cardiologists (65.5%), but significantly lower than QoH AI (88.9%).
- Physicians frequently misclassified ECGs such as de Winter, Transient STEMI, Hyperacute T-wave OMI, and bundle branch block.
- QoH AI demonstrated higher accuracy, with fewer misclassifications, primarily in complex cases like left bundle branch block with OMI.
Conclusions:
- Physicians exhibit frequent misinterpretations of STEMI-equivalent and STEMI-mimic ECGs, impacting critical CLA decisions.
- QoH AI shows superior diagnostic accuracy, offering potential to reduce missed OMI cases and unnecessary CLA.
- Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings in real-world clinical settings.
Introduction:
Accurate ECG interpretation is crucial to identify occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) to determine the need for immediate catheterization laboratory activation (CLA). STEMI-equivalent and STEMI-mimic ECG patterns deviate from conventional STEMI criteria, risking misclassification of OMI cases. The diagnostic accuracy for these complex ECGs is unknown.
Objectives:
This study aimed to measure physician accuracy for interpreting STEMI-equivalent and STEMI-mimic ECGs for catheterization laboratory activation (CLA) and compare their performance to a machine learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm, Queen of Hearts AI (QoH AI).
Methods:
Fifty-three EPs and 42 cardiologists interpreted 18 ECGs (eight STEMI-equivalents, eight STEMI-mimics, with one STEMI, and a normal ECG as controls) to determine the presence of OMI requiring immediate CLA. The same ECGs were analyzed by QoH AI. Interpretations were compared against a reference standard based on angiography, troponin, echocardiography, and clinical follow-up.
Results:
Interpretation accuracies were similar between EPs and cardiologists (65.6 %, 95 % CI [51, 78]; 65.5 %, 95 % CI [51, 77], respectively; p = 0.969), and significantly lower than QoH AI (88.9 %, 95 % CI [82, 93]) vs. physicians overall, 65.6 %, 95 % CI [52, 77]; p < 0.001). Physicians most frequently misclassified de Winter, Transient STEMI, Hyperacute T-wave OMI, and bundle branch block ECGs. QoH AI only misclassified left bundle branch block with OMI and left ventricular aneurysm without OMI.
Conclusion:
Physicians frequently misinterpret STEMI-equivalent and STEMI-mimic ECGs, potentially impacting CLA decisions. QoH AI demonstrated superior accuracy, suggesting a potential to reduce missed OMIs and unnecessary catheterization laboratory activations. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
08:40Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts
Published on: July 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview