Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.3K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.9K
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination02:52

Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination

12.3K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
12.3K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

8.6K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
8.6K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.4K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinct temporal patterns of beta bursts differentiate successful and failed movement cancellation.

iScience·2026
Same author

Spatiotemporal dynamics of mouse tracking reveal general and selective control mechanisms of the congruency sequence effect in Simon tasks.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Inhibition Resolves Simon Conflict: Evidence From Electroencephalogram Decoding.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Clinical and cognitive assessment in Friedreich ataxia clinical trials: a review.

Frontiers in neurology·2025
Same author

Sharing an automatic link is crucial in the congruency sequence effect between spatial conflict tasks.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Responses guide attention.

Cognition·2025
Same journal

Intranasal stromal cell-derived factor-1α mitigates parkinsonian deficits via dual modulation of neuroinflammation and gut microbiota in MPTP-induced models.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Electroacupuncture treatment enhances hippocampal growth hormone level and restores mitochondrial function in vascular dementia rats.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Effects of transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation on thalamic relay: A randomized brain imaging study in chronic low back pain patients.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Adaptive reconfiguration of prefrontal networks during prolonged cognitive interference: Evidence from fNIRS.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Horizontal image compression significantly impairs human face identity recognition.

Brain research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps
11:52

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Published on: February 9, 2017

6.0K

ERP prediction error responses under temporal constraints.

Álvaro Darriba1, Hamdi Habacha1, Yang Seok Cho2

  • 1Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France.

Brain Research
|August 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain prioritizes earlier cues when processing multiple predictions under time pressure. This suggests a bottleneck in integrating sequential predictions, impacting prediction error responses.

Keywords:
Event-related potentialsN2bPredictionProcessing bottleneckTemporal constraints

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps
11:52

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Published on: February 9, 2017

6.0K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Anticipating future events is crucial for adaptive behavior.
  • Understanding how the brain handles multiple, concurrent predictions is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate neural mechanisms of processing multiple predictions under temporal constraints using EEG.
  • To examine event-related potential (ERP) responses to prediction errors (PEs).

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a task involving two auditory cues predicting visual stimulus features (tilt, spatial frequency).
  • Cue-stimulus intervals were varied (200 ms and 1000 ms).
  • EEG recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to assess prediction error responses.

Main Results:

  • Violations of the first cue's prediction reliably evoked N2b responses, irrespective of the second cue's accuracy.
  • Violating both cues also resulted in strong N2b amplitudes.
  • Isolated violations of the second cue did not significantly affect N2b responses.
  • No significant differences were found between short and long cue intervals.

Conclusions:

  • Sequential prediction integration faces a temporal bottleneck.
  • Earlier predictive cues exert a dominant influence on prediction error-related EEG responses.
  • Temporal intervals do not appear to modulate the processing of sequential predictions.