Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Application of an Amplitude-integrated EEG Monitor Cerebral Function Monitor to Neonates
Published on: September 6, 2017
The performance of growth charts in well term newborns in screening for hypoglycemia
Marwa A Khalil1,2, Samantha D'Aversa2, Tara Lozy2,3
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Insights
The WHO Growth Chart (WGC) is more sensitive than the Fenton Growth Chart (FGC) for identifying hypoglycemia risk in newborns. Agreement between the charts was poor, highlighting WGC
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Clinical Pediatrics
Background:
- Hypoglycemia is a common concern in term newborns.
- Accurate identification of at-risk infants is crucial for timely intervention.
- Existing growth charts, like the Fenton Growth Chart (FGC) and WHO Growth Chart (WGC), are used to assess infant size and identify potential risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of the Fenton Growth Chart (FGC) and the WHO Growth Chart (WGC) in identifying term infants at risk for hypoglycemia.
- To evaluate the agreement between FGC and WGC in classifying infants based on size for hypoglycemia screening.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study design was employed.
- Infants were screened for hypoglycemia based on Small for Gestational Age (SGA) or Large for Gestational Age (LGA) status determined by either FGC or WGC.
- Data from 970 infants were analyzed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the two growth charts.
Main Results:
- There was a low agreement (47.7%) between the FGC and WGC.
- Out of 970 infants, 29.2% developed hypoglycemia.
- The WGC demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting all categories of hypoglycemia (e.g., 81.3% vs. 72.4% for general hypoglycemia) compared to the FGC, while the FGC showed higher specificity.
Conclusions:
- The WGC is more sensitive than the FGC for detecting hypoglycemia in term infants.
- Poor agreement exists between the FGC and WGC for identifying hypoglycemia risk.
- The WGC is a potentially superior tool for screening term infants for hypoglycemia due to its higher sensitivity.
Objective:
To compare the performance of Fenton Growth Chart (FGC) with WHO Growth Chart (WGC) to identify term infants at risk for hypoglycemia.
Study Design:
A retrospective study of infants screened for hypoglycemia due to SGA or LGA status determined by FGC and/or WGC.
Results:
Nine hundred and seventy infants were included. There was 47.7% agreement between growth charts. A total of 283 (29.2%) newborns developed hypoglycemia. Of those with hypoglycemia, 53.7% were identified by both charts. WGC was more sensitive for all categories of hypoglycemia examined; hypoglycemia (81.3% [CI 76.2-86.7] vs 72.4% [CI 66.8-77.6]), severe hypoglycemia (80.8% [CI 67.5-90.4] vs 71.2% [CI 56.9-82.9]), and hypoglycemia requiring NICU transfer (88.5% [CI 69.9-97.6] vs 65.4% [CI 44.2-82.8). The FGC was more specific for all hypoglycemia categories.
Conclusions:
There was poor agreement between WGC and FGC for hypoglycemia in term infants. The WGC was more sensitive in detecting hypoglycemia and was non-inferior to the FGC.
Related Concept Videos
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Glucose Transporters
Facilitated diffusion-glucose transporters (GLUTs) are encoded by the solute-linked carrier (SLC) family 2, subfamily A gene family, or SLC2A. The 14 GLUT protein members are distributed into three classes:

