Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Controversies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Irene Tsung1, Sarah E Yentz1, Zachery R Reichert1
1Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract:
Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is an incurable phase of prostate cancer. Diagnostic tools and management strategies for this complex disease are expanding. Despite these advances, more therapies may not be the optimal approach for all patients. This review explores four major controversies surrounding mHSPC management-the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography scans as diagnostic imaging, triplet therapy (androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, and docetaxel chemotherapy), radiation to the prostate and/or oligo-metastases, and bone modifying agents. Critical evaluation of the data emphasizes the need for further work to determine which subgroups of patients with mHSPC benefit from each treatment. With a deeper understanding of these current issues, this review seeks to guide clinicians to refine their clinical practice to help patients achieve their best quantity and quality of life.
Insights
This review examines key debates in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) management, including advanced imaging and combination therapies. It highlights the need for personalized treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Urology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains an incurable disease.
- Current diagnostic and management strategies for mHSPC are evolving.
- Optimal treatment selection is complex and may not involve simply adding more therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically review four major controversies in mHSPC management.
- To evaluate the evidence for specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
- To guide clinicians in refining treatment strategies for improved patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and critical evaluation of existing data.
- Focus on four key areas: PSMA PET imaging, triplet therapy, radiation, and bone agents.
- Analysis of controversies to identify areas needing further research.
Main Results:
- The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) scans in diagnosis is debated.
- The efficacy and patient selection for triplet therapy (ADT, ARPI, docetaxel) require further clarification.
- Optimal use of radiation and bone-modifying agents in mHSPC needs more investigation.
Conclusions:
- Further research is essential to identify patient subgroups who benefit from specific mHSPC treatments.
- A deeper understanding of current controversies can help refine clinical practice.
- The ultimate goal is to enhance both the quantity and quality of life for patients with mHSPC.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Metastasis
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition or EMT is a developmental process commonly observed in wound healing, embryogenesis, and cancer metastasis. EMT is induced by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) ligands, which further...

