Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025
Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
Assessing Physical Therapists' Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology
Cynthia Williams1, Lindsay Toth2, Raine Osborne3
1School of Global Health Management and Informatics, College of Community Innovation and Education, University of Central Florida, 528 W. Livingston Street Ste 401, Orlando, FL, 32081, United States, 1 3212766287.
Background:
Wearable sensor systems maximize visual and clinical feedback for physical therapists to enhance patient outcomes in rehabilitation medicine. However, physical therapists must adopt and accept new technologies for full integration into routine care to advance the use of technology in clinical care. Their role in technology design is critical in adopting and implementing technology. Interprofessional collaboration should be supported in the design of rehabilitation-assisted technologies.
Objective:
We used the established tenets of the Technology Acceptance Model to describe physical therapists' expectations and experiences before and after using a novel wearable system in outpatient physical therapy.
Methods:
This multiple methods pilot study used a comparative pre-post survey and a qualitative semistructured focus group study design. Using purposive sampling, we recruited outpatient physical therapists to pilot the novel wearable technology, describe their expectations and experiences, and participate in a semistructured focus group discussion conducted to gather training and user experience information.
Results:
The study sample consisted of 5 physical therapists with an average age of 38.8 (SD 6.9) years and a work experience average of 12 (SD 7.7) years. Presurvey data show favorable expectations for usefulness and ease of use; however, favorability in both factors decreased after use. For perceived usefulness, all responses moved in the less favorable direction; mean difference -4.4 (SD 3.21); P=.04. All but 2 responses moved in the less favorable direction for overall perceived ease of use; mean difference -4.8 (SD 1.79); P=.04. Themed responses to open-ended questions in the postsurvey were feedback, setup time, accuracy, performance, and enhanced functional activities. Inductive content analysis of the focus group responses resulted in the following themes: system training, system benefits, system challenges, physical therapist perception of patients, and suggestions for improvement. The expectation for frequency of use decreased pre- to postexperience by 53% (mean -22, SD 14.40; P=.04).
Conclusions:
The Technology Acceptance Model-based survey responses and focus group themes outcomes demonstrated that physical therapists' expectations for using new technology were not met. Engaging physical therapists in piloting novel wearable technology highlights the importance of physical therapist engagement in developing, refining, and implementing wearable devices for rehabilitation.
