Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Special section examining risk discussions across clinical specialties using conversation analysis: From information
Maddie Tremblett1, Laura Jenkins2, Jonathan Potter3
1CHSS School of Social Sciences, University of the West of England (UWE), Bristol, UK.
Abstract:
Risk and uncertainty are pervasive in clinical settings, from diagnosis to treatment decision-making and disease management. Accordingly, risk communication has attracted a sustained interest, and is predominantly characterised by information transfer, with a focus on how messages are framed and received. Conversation analysis (CA) provides a different approach to analysing communication, examining the complexities of how risk is broached, is calibrated to individual contexts, and is sensitively negotiated across clinical encounters. This special section showcases original research that significantly advances our insights into risk communication, offering novel and rigorous insights from a spectrum of actual clinical encounters. Seven original papers present analyses of authentic recordings of clinical encounters in the U.K., USA, and Sweden across a range of clinical specialties (primary care, obstetrics, nephrology, paediatrics, and neurology). The nature of the risks varies from immediate and high-stakes situations (such as during labour and delivery), to more distal severe risks (seizure-related unexpected death or fatal anaphylaxis). Other studies examine the likelihood of illness development. Collectively, these studies illustrate the projectability of risk, the collaborative construction of (and resistance to) risk-oriented lifestyle behaviours, and the ways in which patient/carer concerns or worries are invoked. They highlight practices for gathering risk-related information, and the pivotal ways in which risk discussions can facilitate shared decision-making. Studies also show practical ways clinicians sensitively address severe outcomes or morally charged matters of risk-relevant lifestyle behaviours, carefully progressing from establishing a patient's current understanding to providing recommendations. The final paper explores how these types of studies can be translated into training. A guest commentary provides a broad reflection on how CA investigations advance the field of risk communication. Overall, this special section highlights the promise of interactional studies in clinical risk communication, provides recommendations for future research, and calls for the systematic integration of this knowledge into clinical practice.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...