Implications of the API-CAT Trial for Extended Secondary Prophylaxis of Cancer-associated Venous Thromboembolism: Guidance from an Expert Panel
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Florian Langer1, Christina Hart2, Kai-Michael Klima3
1Zentrum für Onkologie, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract:
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an increasingly frequent complication of solid tumors and hematological malignancies, significantly contributing to morbidity and mortality. In patients with acute cancer-associated VTE, therapeutic anticoagulation with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (DXIs) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for 3 to 6 months is recommended by clinical practice guidelines based on randomized controlled trials. Although extended secondary VTE prophylaxis should be considered in patients with persisting active cancer, the type, intensity, and duration of continued anticoagulation have not been rigorously studied until recently. In non-cancer patients, low-dose DXIs (apixaban 2.5 mg BID or rivaroxaban 10 mg OD) are the preferred options to prevent recurrent VTE beyond the first 6 months of treatment. The recently published API-CAT trial compared low-dose with full-dose apixaban for extended secondary VTE prophylaxis in 1,766 patients with active cancer. Over a 12-month period, low-dose apixaban was associated with similar efficacy, but significantly improved safety compared with full-dose apixaban, with cumulative incidence rates of recurrent VTE and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding of 2.1% versus 2.8% (adjusted subhazard ratio [sHR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.41; p < 0.001 for noninferiority) and 12.1% versus 15.6% (adjusted sHR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03 for superiority), respectively. Based on these findings, extended secondary VTE prophylaxis with low-dose DXIs, preferably apixaban 2.5 mg BID, is proposed for most patients with persisting active cancer. To facilitate informed decision-making in clinical practice, we provide an expert consensus on criteria that either justify cessation of anticoagulation or require continued full-dose anticoagulation.
More Related Videos
04:40Author Spotlight: Advancing Cancer Associated Thrombosis Research in Rodent Models
Published on: January 5, 2024
10:09Drug Treatment by Central Venous Catheter in a Mouse Model of Angiotensin II Induced Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Monitoring by 3D Ultrasound
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...