Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: statistical analysis plan for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial

Arlene Jiang1, Naveen Poonai2,3,4, Vinolia Arthur-Hayward2

  • 1Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. arlene.jiang@sickkids.ca.

Trials
|August 8, 2025
PubMed

Insights

The Anxiolysis for Laceration Repair in Children (ALICE) trial will compare intranasal dexmedetomidine, intranasal midazolam, and nitrous oxide to find the best way to reduce distress during laceration repair in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric emergency medicine
  • Pharmacological anxiolysis
  • Clinical trial methodology

Background:

  • Laceration repair in children causes significant distress, with no standard anxiolysis protocol.
  • The Anxiolysis for Laceration Repair in Children (ALICE) trial addresses this need.
  • This paper details the statistical analysis plan for the ALICE trial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the most effective pharmacological agent for managing distress during pediatric laceration repair.
  • To compare intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND), intranasal midazolam (INM), and inhaled nitrous oxide (N2O).

Main Methods:

  • Phase III, Bayesian, open-label trial design.
  • Primary outcome: distress measured by the Observational Scale of Behavioural Distress - Revised (OSBD-R).
  • Bayesian mixed effects model with data-driven priors to rank interventions using probability of being best (Pb).

Main Results:

  • Analysis will rank IND, INM, and N2O based on their effectiveness in reducing pediatric distress.
  • Secondary outcomes include delayed maladaptive behaviors, need for restraint, adverse events, and additional sedation.
  • Cost-effectiveness of sedation in each arm will be evaluated.

Conclusions:

  • The ALICE trial's statistical analysis plan is established.
  • The trial will provide crucial evidence on the optimal agent for pediatric laceration repair anxiolysis.
Abstract