Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Abdelmonam M Hagag1, Muhammed E Kormod2, Mahmoud Elmwafy Ads3
1Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, As Sanafin Al Qibliyyah, Minya Al Qamh, Zagazig, Sharqia, Egypt. abdelmonamhagag@gmail.com.
Background:
Stroke was the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide in 2019. Alteplase is an FDA-approved medication for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke within 4.5 h. However, Tenecteplase is an alternative. We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and the best dose of tenecteplase vs alteplase.
Methodology:
We followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until November 2024. We included RCTs that compared tenecteplase with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients within 4.5 h of onset. Relative risk, 95% CI, and random effects models were used. Our primary endpoints were excellent functional outcomes and mortality. An excellent functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Score of 0-1 at 90 days. The Risk of Bias 2 tool from Cochrane was used to assess the quality of the studies.
Results:
Thirteen RCTs met our inclusion criteria, including 9053 patients, 4416 of whom had tenecteplase. Six studies showed a low risk of bias, and the other 7 had some concerns either in their randomization process or in the deviation from the intended intervention. Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg had a significantly better performance in achieving excellent functional outcomes (p value 0.008), but no difference was observed in mortality rates (P value 0.37). On the other hand, no difference was observed in comparing either TNK 0.1 mg/kg or TNK 0.4 mg/kg versus alteplase in the reported outcomes. A meta-regression revealed that a reduction in the baseline NIHSS score had a significant effect on favorable functional outcomes (P value 0.025). Sensitivity analysis for outcomes comparing either TNK 0.25 mg/kg and TNK 0.1 mg/kg versus alteplase showed that no single study removal affected the significance of the study, while Kvistad 2022 and Logallo 2017 removal changed the significance of outcomes comparing TNK 0.4 mg/kg versus alteplase.
Conclusion:
When compared with alteplase, 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase is superior for achieving excellent functional outcomes and is not inferior in terms of major neurological improvement or death rates. TNKs at 0.25 mg/kg appear to be the optimal dose and a desirable alternative to alteplase.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42024596896.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

