Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
Rectal Cancer Pain Score: A prospective cohort validation study across recovery stages
Louise Kuhlmann1, Katrine J Emmertsen2,3,4, Marianne Krogsgaard5,6
1Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aim:
Chronic pain affects approximately 30% of rectal cancer (RC) survivors, significantly impairing their quality of life (QoL). The Rectal Cancer Pain Score (RCPS) was developed to evaluate chronic pain in RC patients. While its psychometric properties have been demonstrated in cross-sectional studies on long-term survivors, validation in a longitudinal cohort is necessary to establish its utility throughout recovery.
Method:
Patients undergoing RC surgery at three Danish hospitals were enrolled in a prospective cohort-screening program for late sequelae. Patients completed the RCPS, the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and a question regarding the impact of pain on QoL (scored from 1, 'Not at all' to 5 'Very much') at 3-, 12-, 24- and 36 months post-surgery. The RCPS's validity was assessed through the predictive ability of requests for pain-related contact, correlations with self-rated pain impact and associations with QoL. Known-groups validity was evaluated by comparing pain impact and pain referrals.
Results:
A total of 729 patients (mean age 67 years, 36% female) were included. Higher pain scores at 12 months significantly predicted requests for future contacts regarding pain (p < 0.001), supporting predictive validity. The RCPS demonstrated strong concurrent validity, correlating highly with self-rated pain impact (p < 0.001), and there were significant differences in the request for contact between pain impact groups (p < 0.001), confirming construct and known-group validity.
Conclusion:
The RCPS is a valid tool for screening rectal cancer patients prospectively for chronic pain during the follow-up period. Its integration into routine follow-up programs may enable earlier identification and tailored management of chronic pain.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...

